- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alabama fetal homicide Supreme Court ruling could blow Roe V Wade wide open
Posted on 10/31/18 at 9:24 am to bamarep
Posted on 10/31/18 at 9:24 am to bamarep
I never understood how if someone murders a pregnant woman, they are charged with double homicide; but that same woman can murder her own child, and it is legal. I don't think you can have one and not the other.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 9:28 am to saints5021
quote:
I never understood how if someone murders a pregnant woman, they are charged with double homicide; but that same woman can murder her own child, and it is legal. I don't think you can have one and not the other.
One is a choice and one isn't
Posted on 10/31/18 at 9:29 am to saints5021
Me and you both. How does the law know that baby would have been born alive? That's a charge based on assumptions. I thought the law was all about facts.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 1:11 pm to saints5021
It is, I agree, a legal conundrum
Posted on 10/31/18 at 1:27 pm to saints5021
quote:
I never understood how if someone murders a pregnant woman, they are charged with double homicide; but that same woman can murder her own child, and it is legal. I don't think you can have one and not the other.
That's easy. Not all homicides are illegal. It's perfectly reasonable to say "yes of course a fetus is a baby and thus a human with rights" while at the same time saying "abortion is just one of many instances in which homicide isn't illegal"
The problem for liberals is that they NEVER argue from a point of facts and logic, instead preferring emotion so now they would have to change 40 years of argument to make that logical argument.
Of course if they now do change their argument from "a fetus isn't a baby" to what I described above, they have no fricking principles so they won't feel any shame in the blatant hypocrisy.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News