Started By
Message
locked post

I missed this sexist gem from Kirstin Gillibrand a few days ago

Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:17 am
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
41064 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:17 am
“If the Senate was 51% women, would SCOTUS nominees look like Brett Kavanaugh, or like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor? Let’s elect record numbers of women so our high offices are held by leaders who’ll do the most good for the most people.”
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10184 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:20 am to
The only way I will ever vote for a women is she is the only Republican on the ballot. The vast majority of women can never stick to their guns and are terrible leaders. I don't care if I sound sexist, it's the damn truth!
This post was edited on 10/10/18 at 7:22 am
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57581 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:20 am to
Not if many of them were Republican women. Kirsten has become the voice of the unhinged Left; she's nuts.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120728 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:21 am to
Agree. Amy Barrett come on down

What now Kirsten you count
Posted by WesternChauvinist
Member since Sep 2018
445 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:21 am to
Just another Marxist misandrist.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48352 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:37 am to
quote:

Sonia Sotomayor


So women would confirn Justices with subpar intelligence?
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13516 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:39 am to
I wouldn’t wish, Ginsburg, Kagan, or Sotomayor ugly on my worst female enemies!
Gillibrand is a horrible person to wish this on any female except Chelsea where it woul be an improvement.
Posted by TBPland
League City, TX
Member since Sep 2009
1403 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:41 am to
You can’t fix stupid

The next SCOTUS appointment should be a cakewalk then
Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17716 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:59 am to
Gillibrand thinks women will vote for her simply because of her gender. Extremely insulting to the intelligence of women to assume women will not pay attention to ideas or where they stand on certain issues.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28360 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 8:04 am to
Here's my advice to ladies, who think they should be running the world: first..when your toilet backs up in the middle of the night, don't call somebody, fix it yourself. When you get a flat tire, jump out there and frickin change it yourself. Do all the repairs and maintenance around your house. Keep a job and bring home the bacon.

If you can't do all of these simple things yourself, you aren't smart enough or reliable enough, to run anything, or lead anybody.
Posted by Central Tiger
Louisiana
Member since May 2006
2660 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 8:06 am to
quote:

I missed this sexist gem from Kirstin Gillibrand a few days ago


That’s not sexist. Take off your white, male privilege glasses!

Sincerely,

Inclusive, Tolerant Door Scratchers of America

Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Kirstin Gillibrand


Mad that she wore her knees out getting to the Senate...

Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53462 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 8:38 am to
A real republican woman votes with her uterus by producing a litter of strong male republican children
Posted by Jeff Boomhauer
Arlen, TX
Member since Jun 2016
3552 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 8:38 am to
Is she assuming what gender Kavanaugh is identifying as today?
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 8:42 am to
quote:

“If the Senate was 51% women, would SCOTUS nominees look like Brett Kavanaugh, or like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor?

Seems to me she's providing a solid reason not to vote for women.
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 8:50 am to
Those three ladies are partially to blame why Trump was able to nominate BK.

These people walk around with their heads up their arse and have no clue why their life stinks.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
6795 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:07 am to
If electing more women means we get more leftist activist judges, it's going to be a hard pass for me.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29842 posts
Posted on 10/10/18 at 8:44 pm to
Gillibrand is just upset because she had to suck Trump’s dick for a campaign contribution.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram