- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Prosecutor Mitchell sends 5 page memo discrediting Ford’s story.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 10:55 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Posted on 9/30/18 at 10:55 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:and if this was a criminal case because a prosecutor brought charges, that might mean something
“A reasonable prosecutor would not bring charges in this case”
Posted on 9/30/18 at 10:57 pm to MastrShake
Your narrative was destroyed by this lady
Posted on 9/30/18 at 10:58 pm to MastrShake
You’re right. There is an extremely lesser burden of proof that also was not met.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 10:59 pm to MastrShake
quote:
and if this was a criminal case because a prosecutor brought charges, that might mean something
But you were trying to prove a crime had been committed. Distinction without a difference
Posted on 9/30/18 at 11:00 pm to MastrShake
PoliBoard lawyers help me out, but this would hardly approach the "preponderance of evidence" threshold that would be required in civil law as well.
In other words, it's a total joke and an attempt to railroad an innocent man just because he happens to have a different political persuasion than you. One that you claim doesn't give a frick about any of us because he is for deregulation. A kafkaesque character assassination exacted on a man and his family due to your side's selfish, petulant hysteria.
In other words, it's a total joke and an attempt to railroad an innocent man just because he happens to have a different political persuasion than you. One that you claim doesn't give a frick about any of us because he is for deregulation. A kafkaesque character assassination exacted on a man and his family due to your side's selfish, petulant hysteria.
This post was edited on 9/30/18 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 9/30/18 at 11:33 pm to MastrShake
quote:
and if this was a criminal case because a prosecutor brought charges, that might mean something
You forgot to include that she did not believe it met preponderance of evidence standards for even a civil case. its even weaker than a "he said, she said" case...
Posted on 9/30/18 at 11:55 pm to MastrShake
quote:So if a prosecutor brought charges, it would mean something for a prosecutor to not bring charges?
and if this was a criminal case because a prosecutor brought charges, that might mean something
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
Posted on 10/1/18 at 8:04 am to MastrShake
quote:
and if this was a criminal case because a prosecutor brought charges, that might mean something
Uh Huh..
Posted on 10/1/18 at 9:52 am to MastrShake
quote:
if this was a criminal case because a prosecutor brought charges, that might mean something
Look, we admit that No one in a million years would bring charges or convict this man based on what we see here, but we aren't trying to convict him, we are just trying to ruin his life without cause, so you should ignore all of the facts presented and just let us destroy this man because we don't agree with his stances on protecting unborn children and the constitution.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)