Started By
Message

Question on the Williams interception

Posted on 9/17/18 at 11:42 am
Posted by ken757
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2010
255 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 11:42 am
On the NOLA site there is a front page story on the "10 things learned..." (no link because the story does not have a designated url, just go to nola.com). There is a head on shot of the Williams interception and directly behind him is Crawley with, what looks like, an obvious hold of the intended receivers left arm.

The question is: was this a missed interference call on Crawley or, because of the interception, the interference issue is a non factor; something like a pass that is uncatchable?
This post was edited on 9/17/18 at 11:44 am
Posted by mark65mc
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
11291 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 11:45 am to
It's hard to ascertain from a still image what the actual play was. Crawley's arm was likely coming down to bat the ball away when Williams caught it. Williams didn't interfere so they let it go.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166498 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 11:48 am to

This is only proof that Crawley made contact after the interception though.
This post was edited on 9/17/18 at 11:49 am
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7643 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 11:52 am to
As soon as William's fingertips touch the ball you can tackle the receiver so that's why it usually isn't called on interceptions if timing is close
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22486 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 12:08 pm to
Looking at still shots without consulting the video to make determination on plays in football is about the dumbest thing you can do.
Posted by Stevo1856
Member since Jan 2017
122 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 12:28 pm to
During the game I noticed this. It looked like it was a bang bang play where crawled got turned around, knew it and was going to tackle the reciever as he caught the ball. Williams stepped in front and intercepted as this happened in background
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30123 posts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

The question is: was this a missed interference call on Crawley or, because of the interception, the interference issue is a non factor; something like a pass that is uncatchable?


no, an interception does NOT negate PI, and you are right, it was clearly PI, the ref just blew the call or didnt see it, giving the saints a huge break there.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram