Started By
Message

Am I over thinking this...Roth v. Traditional IRA

Posted on 9/5/18 at 10:16 pm
Posted by ChandlerB03
Natchez, MS
Member since Nov 2015
1790 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 10:16 pm
First time poster on the MT board. A little background info...

34yrs old, happily married with two sons, have a mortgage and one car note (other two are paid for). Have a savings account (emergencies only) a CD and some property with some timber on it I plan on cutting it within the next year.

I have never had a job that offered retirement. My current job doesn't offer it either, but it is very stable, a lot of other perks too. So I'm late to the retirement game...

The object in work is to earn more money and grow each year. Therefore putting you in a higher tax bracket. You pay taxes on the money you earn/draw for each month.

I want to contribute the max every year. If I went the traditional way, all of that $5500 would be going straight to my investment. If I plan on retiring at 65, using my social security (not taxed) and lets say another $1200/mo from my IRA I would only be taxed on my $1200 each month ($14,400 income/yr).

If I went the Roth route, I'd be only truly contributing $5500 x .33 (current tax bracket 33%) which would only be $3685. If I continue to earn more money at the current job that tax bracket would increase, therefore even less going straight to my contributions.

Why would I want to pay taxes now at a higher bracket than have to pay the lower tax penalty when I retire? Especially if I am wanting to advance at work and make more money. Am I wrong for thinking this way?
This post was edited on 9/5/18 at 10:21 pm
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 11:22 pm to
Do you thnk taxes will be higher or lower in 31 years?

Also I wouldn’t count on SS being the same 31 years from now.

And I thought SS was taxed as income?

Look up info on Roth Conversions.
This post was edited on 9/5/18 at 11:24 pm
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
49103 posts
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:23 am to
Why not both? Max Roth then put extra savings into taxable account
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3643 posts
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:26 am to
quote:

Why would I want to pay taxes now at a higher bracket than have to pay the lower tax penalty when I retire? Especially if I am wanting to advance at work and make more money. Am I wrong for thinking this way?


No, you're on the right track. But nobody truly knows what tax rates will look like in 30 yrs, so most people try to do both pre-tax and post-tax retirement investing to lower the risk. It's usually through 401k + Roth, but you can do the same with a tIRA, you just won't get any sort of match.
Posted by hungryone
river parishes
Member since Sep 2010
11987 posts
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:28 am to
Incorporate that timber enterprise into a sole member LLC and do a solo 401k, which has much higher contribution limits.
Posted by wasteland
City of peace
Member since Apr 2011
5607 posts
Posted on 9/6/18 at 7:02 am to
Set up a business for your timber income. Then you can set up a solo 401k or SEP IRA and contribute up to 54k a year tax deductible.

If youre in the 33% tax bracket, dont you make too much to contribute to a roth?

As someone said, read into roth conversions. You can choose to pay taxes on IRA money and transfer it to a roth. Its very popular for my 60 to 70 old clients now that taxes are low. Also decreases your RMDs at 70 1/2
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2137 posts
Posted on 9/6/18 at 7:12 am to
Sounds like you're not eligible for ROTH If you were in 33% tax bracket in 2017 ($233,350 to $416,700) you exceeded the ROTH max allowable income which was $196,000. This year the income threshold is $199,000.
You could do backdoor ROTH though.

As other posters suggested tax rates are likely to rise in the future. However, you're personal tax rate isn't likely to be as high as it is today. I'd probably the tax benefit now since you'll probably be in a much lower bracket in retirement compared to that current income.

With your income and no 401k or pension you should also be loading up taxable accounts. If you happen to be in a low tax bracket when you withdraw you could pay zero % long term capital gains. Since you won't have taxable income flowing from 401k withdrawal or pension taxable accounts might be advantageous in your situation.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 9/9/18 at 5:59 pm to
One thing that's good about Roths, especially early in life when you don't have much yet, is that they are a great place for your emergency fund because you can withdraw at any time immediately up to the amount you contributed, while earnings grow tax-free.

Just make sure you invest the emergency fund part very conservatively (cash or cash equivalents) because you don't want your emergency money to be subject to major fluctuations just when you need it.

Of course, you can do this for awhile and when you're satisfied you have enough stashed away you can start contributing to a traditional IRA for retirement.

But a Roth is always > savings for emergency money.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram