- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

California passes strongest net neutrality law in the country
Posted on 9/2/18 at 12:16 am
Posted on 9/2/18 at 12:16 am
quote:
California’s legislature has approved a bill being called the strongest net neutrality law in the US. The bill would ban internet providers from blocking and throttling legal content and prioritizing some sites and services over others. It would apply these restrictions to both home and mobile connections.
That would essentially restore the net neutrality rules enacted federally under former President Barack Obama, which were later repealed by the Federal Communications Commission under the watch and guidance of current chairman Ajit Pai. But this bill actually goes further than those rules with an outright ban on zero-rating — the practice of offering free data, potentially to the advantage of some companies over others — of specific apps. Zero-rating would, however, still be allowed as long as the free data applies to an entire category of apps. So an ISP could offer free data for all video streaming apps, but not just for Netflix.
The bill was cleared with a final vote in the state Senate today, being approved 23-11. It passed in the State Assembly yesterday, after initially being approved in the Senate back in May. But the bill had changed in the ensuing months, so it needed to return to its chamber of origin today for final approval. The Electronic Frontier Foundation called the final legislation “a gold standard net neutrality bill.”
If it becomes law, internet providers are certain to sue. There’s already one clear obstacle: the FCC made a rule prohibiting states from creating net neutrality laws. That rule hasn’t been held up in court, and the last time the FCC tried to preempt state laws around broadband, it failed. But that’ll at least be one of the issues at play.
Several other states have taken action on net neutrality, but most have done so through executive orders or laws that skirt the FCC’s prohibition. California, on the other hand, is one of a small number of states tackling the issue head-on, which will certainly mean going to court.
LINK
Posted on 9/2/18 at 12:19 am to rickgrimes
Classic Commiefornia trying to regulate free enterprise.
Posted on 9/2/18 at 12:21 am to rickgrimes
So I guess California is trying to revive all the dead bodies on its streets.
Posted on 9/2/18 at 12:29 am to rickgrimes
Regulating internet providers...is okay.
But regulating the biggest social media platforms in the world, that are actively censoring half our country... is hitleresque??
But regulating the biggest social media platforms in the world, that are actively censoring half our country... is hitleresque??
Posted on 9/2/18 at 1:19 am to rickgrimes
I thought the Senate already reversed the Trump net neutrality bill.
Posted on 9/2/18 at 3:55 am to rickgrimes
I never knew the Internet operated exclusively within the borders of California.
Posted on 9/2/18 at 9:31 am to rickgrimes
So California will be the first to return internet service to its people? Lucky. I'm tired of writing letters to my friends.
Posted on 9/2/18 at 9:45 am to rickgrimes
quote:
and prioritizing some sites and services over others.
This is the main goal of net neutrality right here. Rig thing's even more for the Google's and Facebook's of the world.
Posted on 9/2/18 at 9:58 am to Seldom Seen
quote:
This is the main goal of net neutrality right here. Rig thing's even more for the Google's and Facebook's of the world.
Man, I would LOVE to hear this explained.
Posted on 9/2/18 at 12:12 pm to StrangeBrew
quote:you people are so ignorant. It's like you idiots have no clue what these tech companies are doing. They're screwing us over, and you're begging them to do it. You might hate govt control, and it's usually crap, but corporate control is no better.
California = China West
Posted on 9/2/18 at 12:13 pm to BestBanker
quote:
Millions are dead
Yep. More regulation!
Posted on 9/2/18 at 12:30 pm to rickgrimes
Interstate commerce clause says hello
This post was edited on 9/2/18 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 9/2/18 at 12:38 pm to airfernando
quote:
you people are so ignorant. It's like you idiots have no clue what these tech companies are doing.
And you do?
Posted on 9/2/18 at 12:59 pm to Strannix
quote:
Interstate commerce clause says hello
C’mon man! What’s a little unconstitutionality amongst friends?
I would actually like to see how this would turn out for the people’s republic of cali.
Posted on 9/2/18 at 1:01 pm to rickgrimes
Net neutrality laws are moronic.
Posted on 9/2/18 at 1:36 pm to Plx1776
Yes you only censor people who provide access to the platform.
You don't censor the platform... unless it's a conservative one
You don't censor the platform... unless it's a conservative one
Posted on 9/2/18 at 3:20 pm to rickgrimes
Hi there hello, I'm from the government and I'm hear to help you....
Popular
Back to top


15











