- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Just sat through an interesting "Lunch and Learn" on the welfare system
Posted on 8/23/18 at 1:55 pm to WorkinDawg
Posted on 8/23/18 at 1:55 pm to WorkinDawg
quote:
A very easy and fruitful first step would be to end the nonsense that not only discourages work, but makes it dam near impossible. You should never lose more in benefit than you make working. For every $1 of income, reduce benefits by $.50. ALWAYS create a positive incentive to work. This would at least get the folks who actually want to work moving towards independence.
Completely agree. The other side of the coin is that wages are too low. 15 an hour is ridiculous especially outside major cities, but 10 an hour minimum wage wouldn’t be that bad.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:01 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
many years ago I worked in the Department of Social Services.
couple things I have witnessed first hand -
-fraud is more common than legitimacy
-recipients (called clients) are qualified without much digging into the factual nature of their claims because if the Department didn't utilize the dedicated funds then the amount allocated would decrease the following year
-HUGE entitlement mentality of many of the applicants and recipients
-"God will provide" is the most common answer for "how do you pay your bills?"
- "Have a blessed day" came from some of the worst offenders haahahahah
-the number of women in the system with multiple kids from multiple sperm donors is astounding
-the most common question "they wanna give me more hours at work, how much is that gonna cut my benefits?" and the next week they quit
I only worked in that Department for 3 years, but it was enough to see it up close and personal.
My mother worked there for over 30 years (10 years of food stamps, 20 years of child relocation) retired around 02 or 03) so what you're saying is nothing new to me. Along with the growing caseload they had continual layoffs (when they moved into their new, bigger building they were 2 and 3 to an office, by the time she retired 10-ish years later everyone had their own office with some empty, and all that time the case loads did not diminish).
A couple of her stories I remember:
- one client whose primary ambition in life was to move into the hotel with her boyfriend
- another client whom she had discussed birth control pills with, when she asked the client "so what do you do when you meet a man you want to have sex with" the client's response was "tell him to wait a few minutes while I take this pill."
My step-father spent his career in education, retired as a superintendent. Both of them have stated that one of the worst abuses out there is SSI ("crazy checks").
This post was edited on 8/23/18 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:02 pm to Volatile
The biggest barrier in all of this is the $150 a week that daycare costs per kid (on the low end). That's like $8k year per kid.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:07 pm to IrishTiger89
Ya that is a big issue
But i remember having a conversation with a social worker friend of mine who says the black market for daycare is pretty vibrant which is bad because unlicensed is unsafe, but good in the sense that it is cheaper.
I don’t have the data, but I assume one of the largest black markets in America is daycare
But i remember having a conversation with a social worker friend of mine who says the black market for daycare is pretty vibrant which is bad because unlicensed is unsafe, but good in the sense that it is cheaper.
I don’t have the data, but I assume one of the largest black markets in America is daycare
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:12 pm to Bard
quote:
- another client whom she had discussed birth control pills with, when she asked the client "so what do you do when you meet a man you want to have sex with" the client's response was "wait a few minutes while I take this pill."
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:13 pm to anc
quote:where on Earth is daycare that cheap. It's costs me twice that for 1 kid
Daycare for two kids on the cheap end would be $150
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:13 pm to Bard
quote:
Both of them have stated that one of the worst abuses out there is SSI ("crazy checks").
This. SSI/SSDI is abused like crazy. I've told the story before, but I interned at a SSA office for a semester during my graduate degree.
Only two types I ever saw:
1. Quadraplegics, people with late-stage MS, and various other debilitating conditions that broke your heart.
2. People you knew straight up were abusing the system. Act like their backs hurt, couldn't walk, etc. Then see them chasing their kids in the parking lot, jumping in their cars, etc.
There was no middle ground. I went home a mixture of depressed and enraged each day.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:16 pm to IrishTiger89
quote:
The biggest barrier in all of this is the $150 a week that daycare costs per kid (on the low end). That's like $8k year per kid.
I bet a lot of welfare queens use this as an excuse, but leave their kids with their grandmothers frequently to go do non-work stuff.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:22 pm to anc
Had a commander that used to do that lunch and learn BS. Nobody wanted to hear that BS during lunch.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:25 pm to anc
I just learned yesterday that Section 8 status is inheritable. As long as you stay within certain guidelines, an entire family’s lineage can stay Section 8 babies for eternity.
Now why would that be a thing?
Now why would that be a thing?
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:27 pm to Sev09
Generational welfare, the dims love it. Those folks shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:31 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
many years ago I worked in the Department of Social Services.
couple things I have witnessed first hand -
-fraud is more common than legitimacy
-recipients (called clients) are qualified without much digging into the factual nature of their claims because if the Department didn't utilize the dedicated funds then the amount allocated would decrease the following year
-HUGE entitlement mentality of many of the applicants and recipients
-"God will provide" is the most common answer for "how do you pay your bills?"
- "Have a blessed day" came from some of the worst offenders haahahahah
-the number of women in the system with multiple kids from multiple sperm donors is astounding
-the most common question "they wanna give me more hours at work, how much is that gonna cut my benefits?" and the next week they quit
I only worked in that Department for 3 years, but it was enough to see it up close and personal.
I don't doubt what you have written one bit. But be honest. How employable are these people really? Any job they could possibly get, and they wouldn't be capable of supporting themselves, let alone a family.
My viewpoint is it is only going to get worse, regarding any possible economic niche they could fill. Going to be a lot more formerly untouched by automation in the same boat too, though odds are most of them find something, even if it is nowhere near as good.
I think the system needs to be designed so that every additional kid is LESS spending money. That to me acknowledges something I believe, that these people are basically unemployable at any wage, yet also removes the perverse incentive to have more children.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:34 pm to slackster
quote:
but it's not a good life.
For them, it is. It wouldn't be for you.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:35 pm to anc
When we become a socialist society, they won't compel us to learn during lunch. Finally, one day, we shall all be free.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:42 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
Was it Maine that instituted the volunteer clause and welfare recipients dropped 80%.
Sort of. What Maine (and now another state... Kentucky, maybe?) did was to set a requirement for work or education in order to receive TANF benefits starting in 2012 (they have to work at least 20 hours a week, participate in a work-training program or meet volunteering requirements) but only for able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWD's).
How well has that worked? LINK
CY..........TANF Enrollment........Change from previous CY
2007..........13,451........................N/A
2008..........13,890........................3.3%
2009..........14,705........................5.9%
2010..........15,188........................3.3%
2011..........14,510.......................-4.5%
2012..........10,009......................-31.0%
2013...........8,117......................-18.9%
2014...........6,716......................-17.3%
2015...........5,817......................-13.4%
2016...........4,855......................-16.5%
2017...........4,492.......................-7.5%
While these numbers speak for themselves about how much abuse there was as well as how even minor requirements can change use levels, there have been other positive effects as well.
quote:
Over the four-year period after our reforms, people who had prior earnings records saw their wages increase by an average of 237%. This was from the baseline period in the year before the reforms compared to the last three quarters in 2015 and the first quarter of 2016.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:50 pm to jchamil
quote:
I think you're giving the politicians too much credit. I believe there are many who do exactly that
I disagree. There may be some who refuse to change welfare laws for that reason, but none that I know of that have crafted these laws with the distinct purpose of creating dependency. Doing so would mean having keen foresight and that is something most politicians do not possess.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 2:51 pm to Bard
quote:
Over the four-year period after our reforms, people who had prior earnings records saw their wages increase by an average of 237%. This was from the baseline period in the year before the reforms compared to the last three quarters in 2015 and the first quarter of 2016.
This is why our current system is criminally negligent. An awful lot of these folks would blow well past minimum wage in no time, if they weren't put in a position where they can't get started because they lose more than they can make. Some folks are beyond help. But many aren't, and they want to work, yet our system puts up barriers instead of "a hand up".
Posted on 8/23/18 at 3:03 pm to caliegeaux
quote:
or uncle tom leave the farm
Uncle Tom never left the farm, he gave his life so that others would be free.
Ol' Tom gets a bum rap these days.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 3:07 pm to anc
When you don't stigmatize being on welfare all kinds of bad shite happens.
Posted on 8/23/18 at 7:05 pm to Bard
quote:
I disagree. There may be some who refuse to change welfare laws for that reason, but none that I know of that have crafted these laws with the distinct purpose of creating dependency. Doing so would mean having keen foresight and that is something most politicians do not possess.
The professional that was giving the talk basically said this. If it were an elaborate scheme, it would make sense - but being on the inside it was her opinion that just government being inefficient and not realizing what would happen, which happens all of the time
Someone asked how to fix it and she said something surprising. Said she would rip the band aid off. Stop all benefits immediately, have them reapply and hire extra staff to comb over every application and make sure they truly needed benefits. She also thought "half" was a good number on who truly qualified vs. were gaming the system, I would have thought 10-20%.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News