- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
It's truly a shame that it's a forgone conclusion all the Democrats vote no
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:26 am
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:26 am
on SCOTUS nominee.
When is the media and frankly the President going to hammer the obvious obstruction of serving the American people they were sworn in to do as Senate leaders?
Dick Durbin on CNN said "all it takes is one Republican to vote no and this confirmation is over" (he was talking about McCain being out or unavailable.
So on national TV before the SCOTUS pick was announced this clown was on cable news telling all of us how the Democrats would play this situation. "We must stop the President's pick"...but offered no reason...
What in the hell is going on in our government?
I mean really, how do these people sleep at night?
A judge is either qualified or they are not...Kav seems to be qualified and likable....
The politics around the court is something I guess I will never understand...
When is the media and frankly the President going to hammer the obvious obstruction of serving the American people they were sworn in to do as Senate leaders?
Dick Durbin on CNN said "all it takes is one Republican to vote no and this confirmation is over" (he was talking about McCain being out or unavailable.
So on national TV before the SCOTUS pick was announced this clown was on cable news telling all of us how the Democrats would play this situation. "We must stop the President's pick"...but offered no reason...
What in the hell is going on in our government?
I mean really, how do these people sleep at night?
A judge is either qualified or they are not...Kav seems to be qualified and likable....
The politics around the court is something I guess I will never understand...
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:31 am to ApexTiger
It is about to be their Alamo. They are surrounded. They will fight to their death, which isn't far off.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:35 am to ApexTiger
Think of it as life being sucked out of them like death throes
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:35 am to ApexTiger
quote:
all it takes is one Republican to vote no and this confirmation is over
Maybe I have been watching too much House of Cards, but if a simple majority is needed, can't Pence cast a vote?
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:38 am to ApexTiger
quote:
When is the media and frankly the President going to hammer the obvious obstruction of serving the American people they were sworn in to do as Senate leaders?
You mean like when Merrick Garland was up for SCOTUS?
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:39 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
You mean like when Merrick Garland was up for SCOTUS?
This is relevant how? Whataboutisms are tired, lazy, and completely insufficient as justification for actions.
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 6:41 am
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:43 am to ApexTiger
Same thing Republicans said about Obama if he had made a nominee....
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:46 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
You mean like when Merrick Garland was up for SCOTUS?
What was the vote tally on him?
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:47 am to fjlee90
quote:
Maybe I have been watching too much House of Cards, but if a simple majority is needed, can't Pence cast a vote?
51 Rs in the Senate. 47 Ds and 2 indies. Let's say McCain doesn't vote. All other Rs vote yea. Let's say the 47 and 2 vote nay. From what I know, Pence can only vote in case of a tie vote. Therefore, 50-49 won't get a vote from Pence so I surmise the vote would fail since you need a 50 plus 1 in order for the nomination to pass.
Anyone correct me if I'm wrong. I might be.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:50 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
This is relevant how? Whataboutisms are tired, lazy, and completely insufficient as justification for actions.
Irrational justification last time caused it this time.
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 6:52 am
Posted on 7/10/18 at 6:52 am to BeeFense5
quote:
Lazy answer
Why? I’m not saying I think Dems should reject any candidate outright, in fact I think that’s irresponsible as representatives of the people.
I’m saying Republicans are no better and would do the same thing if the roles were reversed. Both sides are too obsessed with “winning” a fight to actually make smart choices
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:00 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Irrational justification last time caused it this time.
No, politicians who think like you, i.e, in juvenile terms of winning, payback, and pandering to uneducated voters is what caused it this time. It’s also why they are collectively the most ineffective body of people in the country.
The National political issues/discussion could very very easily be elevated to a more productive and substantive level. Irresponsible and shortsighted politicians and their complicit buddies in the media simply choose not to.
This post was edited on 7/10/18 at 7:02 am
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:03 am to fjlee90
quote:
t if a simple majority is needed, can't Pence cast a vote?
Senate is now 50-49 GOP. If one GOP votes 'no' then it is 49-50 = no tie.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:04 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Senate is now 50-49 GOP. If one GOP votes 'no' then it is 49-50 = no tie.
Yep. Because John McCain is nothing more than a self serving politician who cares more about grandstanding and his “legacy” than actually performing his duties as a representative of the people of Arizona.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:07 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Senate is now 50-49 GOP.
So you're saying McCain is a no-show?
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:11 am to Homesick Tiger
Realistically, McCain will never leave Arizona again.
It’s a shame but the Senate has become so partisan it will pretty much be a party line vote.
It’s a shame but the Senate has become so partisan it will pretty much be a party line vote.
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:13 am to ApexTiger
Merrick Garland thinks it totally unfair that some democrats are already pledging to vote no
Posted on 7/10/18 at 7:15 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
You mean like when Merrick Garland was up for SCOTUS?
What was the vote tally on him?
How many committee hearings took place on Garland?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News