Started By
Message

re: Could any strategy have worked in Vietnam?

Posted on 7/7/18 at 9:24 pm to
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64844 posts
Posted on 7/7/18 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

not getting involved
is the only answer
Posted by BigAppleBucky
New York
Member since Jan 2014
1807 posts
Posted on 7/8/18 at 1:40 pm to
Getting a do over in 1945 the US could have allied itself with Ho and he never would have given himself over to the Reds. He saw common cause against the Japanese with the USA. Had the US persuaded France to give up its colonial empire instead of trying to hang on to it, everyone would be happier today.
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
53975 posts
Posted on 7/8/18 at 3:41 pm to
We could have invaded properly with Generals calling the shots and taken over Vietnam in 8 weeks!
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 7/8/18 at 4:31 pm to
Yes,really very simple, acted as President Trump as acted, let the Chief Staff run the war.
This post was edited on 7/8/18 at 4:32 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99877 posts
Posted on 7/8/18 at 9:59 pm to
Yes.

Total war. Go after Hanoi and pressure the frick out of neighboring countries to cut off the Cong supply lines (carrot [$$] first, then the hammer if they don't play along).
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20534 posts
Posted on 7/8/18 at 10:12 pm to
The Phoenix Program
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67546 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Was there anything we could have done other than not getting involved at all?

Just 1 thing; go into with the goal of winning, as in annihilate North Viet Nam
Posted by brian_wilson
Member since Oct 2016
3581 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 10:50 am to
I recently visited vietnam.

We could have taken over the country if we had brought everything we could, but then we would have faced insurrection for however long the occupation lasted.

We really screwed the pooch on this one. It will be interesting in 20 years to compare/contrast what happened in Iraq to vietnam.

btw, the vietnamese I met held no grudge against americans. they loved americans, and were super friendly.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 7/11/18 at 8:50 pm to
Did generals get to consider all approaches?

No.

It was political.

Only.

It was a sham.

You have to win the hearts and minds first.

The local politics was as bad as Iraq. Worse.

Fwiw, if you were going to do such a war, train your people better.
What is objective?

If the enemy uses Mao propaganda and training methods, maybe they will also use Mao tactics.


They moved troops through commie Laos to move troops. Surprised?

Target rich environment.


Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
12266 posts
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Was there anything we could have done



Protect President Kennedy instead of setting him up to be assasinated...



Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48716 posts
Posted on 7/11/18 at 11:38 pm to
IMHO, yes, BUT, pursuing such a strategy might have been beyond the capabilities of the "reigning" US military and political leaders of that time.

The first phase of The Strategy would involve direct negotiations between US political leaders and China, the Soviet Union and even North Vietnam. At those talks, the USA could have made its war aims clear -- independence and peace for the two separate nations of South and North Vietnam. The USA would inform all parties that the USA would wage Total War to achieve its war aims, and that North Vietnam's entire infrastructure would be targeted in this war -- to include all of its industrial and maritime infrastructure, such as port facilities and railroads.

Second Phase: Fulfill the promises made at the talks, should North Vietnam persist in its conventional and unconventional efforts to conquer the Republic of South Vietnam.

Third Phase: Ongoing throughout US involvement -- shape the nascent South Vietnamese nation-state to shape and improve develop its methods of governance -- give it a sort of crash course on civil rights, a judicial system, etc.

Of course, this Strategy might have provoked China and the Soviet Union into a wider war. Low risk of that happening, IMHO, so, that's why IMHO, this Strategy could have worked.

The KEY to the Strategy would be to make it clear to North Vietnam that the USA would guarantee it's sovereignty AND would make North Vietnam a trading partner, should that some day be mutually beneficial. At some point, my guess is that North Vietnam would have chosen peace, because we would have been killing so many millions of those people that they would be running out of men and women.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69469 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 12:32 am to
Yeah. Never going on the first place and not supporting France's Empire after ww2.
Posted by Vastmind
B Ara
Member since Sep 2013
4992 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 6:24 am to
My uncle commanded a base in Vietnam as a Marine Colonel aviator. He said that “every time they made progress they were told to withdraw. Politics got in the way.”

My analysis: It’s almost like the military industrial complex wanted to drag the war on so they continue to sell arms to both sides.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram