- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The timeline doesnt lie. Trump investigation was started AFTER he won the nomination
Posted on 5/16/18 at 2:21 pm to buckeye_vol
Posted on 5/16/18 at 2:21 pm to buckeye_vol
It makes sense that you would immediately begin an investigation into a campaign/candidate upon that candidate winning a party primary and entering the general election campaign.
It makes sense that you would abruptly conclude an investigation into a campaign/candidate upon him/her winning a party primary and entering the general election campaign.
Both of these happened at exactly the same time, relating to candidates nominated for exactly the same office. Do you believe both statements are correct? Does it not seem at all suspicious to you? Comey himself laid out his motivations for quickly ending, then "reopening" at the last minute the investigation. And it had everything to do with the expected outcome of the election and the desire to hide any political/partisan motivations involved in those decisions.
It makes sense that you would abruptly conclude an investigation into a campaign/candidate upon him/her winning a party primary and entering the general election campaign.
Both of these happened at exactly the same time, relating to candidates nominated for exactly the same office. Do you believe both statements are correct? Does it not seem at all suspicious to you? Comey himself laid out his motivations for quickly ending, then "reopening" at the last minute the investigation. And it had everything to do with the expected outcome of the election and the desire to hide any political/partisan motivations involved in those decisions.
2
Posted on 5/16/18 at 2:52 pm to GRTiger
quote:
It makes sense that you would immediately begin an investigation into a campaign/candidate upon that candidate winning a party primary and entering the general election campaign.
It makes sense that you would abruptly conclude an investigation into a campaign/candidate upon him/her winning a party primary and entering the general election campaign.
Don't tax bucknut. He has a hard time connecting the dots
Posted on 5/16/18 at 2:56 pm to GRTiger
quote:But then they didn't actually release any damaging information about the investigation right before the election for one candidate, but they did for the other. Yet, somehow they were out to get the candidate whose information they withhold to help the the candidate whose information they released?
Both of these happened at exactly the same time, relating to candidates nominated for exactly the same office. Do you believe both statements are correct? Does it not seem at all suspicious to you? Comey himself laid out his motivations for quickly ending, then "reopening" at the last minute the investigation. And it had everything to do with the expected outcome of the election and the desire to hide any political/partisan motivations involved in those decisions.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News