Started By
Message

re: Spinoff: House Bill 391 re: access to water over private water bottoms

Posted on 3/14/18 at 11:41 am to
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81738 posts
Posted on 3/14/18 at 11:41 am to
While I don't think it's going anywhere, his part will be interesting to watch,

quote:

subject to the ebb and flow of the tide of the Gulf of Mexico and the tidally influenced arms and tributaries passing through the coastal areas of this state.


Seems like more definitions are needed.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12729 posts
Posted on 3/14/18 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Seems like more definitions are needed.

Agreed.

Also, I think it's important to note that the bill also states
quote:

the provisions of this subsection shall not apply to running waters passing over privately owned water bottoms where navigation has been prevented or impeded by an obstacle constructed by a private landowner prior to March 2, 2018.

So this only applies to any waters not already blocked off.

Still, would be a win for the pro-access side if they get any of the currently-private-but-not-blocked-off waters open to access.
This post was edited on 3/14/18 at 11:55 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram