Started By
Message

re: 'It's unethical': LSU DB Kristian Fulton, through attorney, fighting two-year NCAA ban

Posted on 3/13/18 at 3:50 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95947 posts
Posted on 3/13/18 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

And here's Fulton.. being dumb. The NCAA has the small dick syndrome that day.. and they want to make an example.. and they throw down a punishment much harsher than all of those examples put together.
No. They have a clear defined rule in place here. There was no judgement needed
Posted by tgerb8
Huntsvegas
Member since Aug 2007
6001 posts
Posted on 3/13/18 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

No. They have a clear defined rule in place here. There was no judgement needed


and that's fine and dandy. If they want to throw out that type of punishment for this
quote:

clear and defined
rule then they better throw out something just as harsh or (in a normal world) much more harsh for the eleven thousand other, much more blatant, examples where they basically did nothing.
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93809 posts
Posted on 3/13/18 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

No. They have a clear defined rule in place here. There was no judgement needed

Exactly. Fans can bitch about the rule all they want and I kind of agree. I mean, you can say he made a mistake and I agree with that. But, in this case, he actually made 2. He cheated and he falsified his sample. I like the NFL rule that a diluted sample is a positive and go with that. Half of a player's eligibility is too much for this if he's tested clean for a full year.

Bottom line is that there is a clear, defined rule and a punishment that goes along with breaking that rule.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram