Started By
Message

re: Louisiana special session: Failure.

Posted on 3/5/18 at 9:21 am to
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14513 posts
Posted on 3/5/18 at 9:21 am to
quote:

I love how every small market conservative screams about reducing entitlements until their kid becomes tops eligible. After that the justification begins.


If you see TOPS as just a scholarship program then, I guess. But I see it as a move toward vouchers for higher education. It helps fund the college education of stronger students and gives them choice.

The TOPS requirements, low as they are, are HIGHER than every college entrance requirement other than LSU. So I know that my tax dollars that fund TOPS, as opposed to direct state aid to colleges, are going to qualified students.

Rather than cut TOPS, I think direct state aid should be cut first. Now ideally you fund both. But if it is a choice between them, keep TOPS and fund the better students.



Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 3/5/18 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Rather than cut TOPS, I think direct state aid should be cut first.

but TOPS is tied to tuition prices
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37157 posts
Posted on 3/5/18 at 11:00 am to
quote:

The TOPS requirements, low as they are, are HIGHER than every college entrance requirement other than LSU. So I know that my tax dollars that fund TOPS, as opposed to direct state aid to colleges, are going to qualified students.


Well... that's because in order to have enough students for all our public universities, we have to have embarrassingly low entrance requirements.

But this makes me think of a solution.

Keep TOPS where it is... but require every 4 year school in LA to have minimum entrance requirements to be at the TOPS level. A school (like LSU) can go higher, but no lower.

That might cause 4-5 colleges to shut down. Then you save money on the back end.

quote:

Rather than cut TOPS, I think direct state aid should be cut first. Now ideally you fund both. But if it is a choice between them, keep TOPS and fund the better students.


Isn't TOPS now frozen? If that's the case, then cutting state aid = higher tuition, which means the TOPS people (with everyone else) woudl pay more.

Before the freeze, state aid cuts just meant TOPS cost the state more. It was beyond stupid.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram