Started By
Message

re: US Army drops grenade throwing as a requirement to graduate-new recruits can't throw

Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:12 pm to
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
29142 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Somewhere along the way the fathers of this generation failed them.





"Who are they?"

Signed,
This Generation of Bastards
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16738 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Article also points out that this may be a lace in standards because the chick soldiers can’t cut it


Take all of that into consideration that the Army is looking to revamp the APFT with events that will be outright impossible for these same individuals. I work with a Drill Sergeant unit and even the few 300+ guys are balking at some of the events being tested.
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6514 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:19 pm to
So we don't give them grenades anymore right? Cause if they cant throw it far enough to keep from blowing each other up, they shouldn't get one
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112803 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Due to chicks but they will never say so


This. All basic training standards can be normalized for women except throwing a grenade. There is no 'well, that's good enough'.
Posted by geaux88
Northshore, LA
Member since Oct 2003
16355 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

It’s a shame Rangers and SF have to be associated in any way with Big Army


Ok guys, get off the Army's dick. I love you Jarheads and yes, you can fight, but do NOT suggest that the 3ID, 2ACR, 82nd, 101st, 10th Mountain and (some) other Army units are not just as capable. The Army is bigger, much bigger. Because of that, there are more weak assed REMFS, POGUES AND POGS...

Also, I'm sure that front line earth pigs and other combat arms units of the Army can throw the friggin grenade......

I hate the stupidity of the "social experiments" as much as anyone, and it's disgusting, but front line Army Infantry and Armor units are not the weak pussies you try to make them out to be.
This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 2:29 pm
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6578 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:22 pm to
We know which kids didn’t play “travel ball”
Posted by Geauxboy
NW Arkansas
Member since Oct 2006
4856 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

‘We are finding that there are a large number of trainees that come in that quite frankly just physically don't have the capacity to throw a hand grenade 20 to 25 to 30 meters,’ he said


Are we just deeking the enemy with this? Or is someone sending a memo to all potential enemies that they must now be closer than 82 feet once the war officially starts?
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

During the debate over allowing women in combat roles, the left kept denying that training requirements would not be lowered to accommodate them.


The Left's goal is the destruction, excuse me "deconstruction" of our society, excuse me "tPatriarchy".

They are destroyers of anything good and decent.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43480 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

ever since Vietnam the Army has been the weakest link


Hey frick you buddy. I'll have you know there is NO other service that is as good as the US Army when it comes to pointless powerpoint training, endless sexual assault classes, and "hunting the good stuff"!!

Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:57 pm to
which branch did you serve in
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram