- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?
Posted on 2/12/18 at 2:19 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Posted on 2/12/18 at 2:19 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
O is the worst decision of the three. Archer was a promotion from within. There are other highly successful coaches (like Osborne) who were promoted from within.
So archer wasn’t as bad as a hire because he was promoted from within...the exact same way Orgeron was.
1
Posted on 2/12/18 at 2:27 pm to MLCLyons
quote:
.the exact same way Orgeron was
not exact.
Archer was young and on his way up. getting his first shot at a HC gig. Others were considering him as well.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News