- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is Woodrow F. Call a hero?
Posted on 2/9/18 at 8:21 am
Posted on 2/9/18 at 8:21 am
Spoilers below
Just finished the novel Lonesome Dove for the first time, and the question weighs on me.
We all know Clara was overly harsh on the man, and we know he acted heroically in ridding South Texas of various menaces, but he certainly failed to do right by Newt.
Is the book saying that he was a hero with flaws or is it saying what he himself feared: that he was a fraud?
Just finished the novel Lonesome Dove for the first time, and the question weighs on me.
We all know Clara was overly harsh on the man, and we know he acted heroically in ridding South Texas of various menaces, but he certainly failed to do right by Newt.
Is the book saying that he was a hero with flaws or is it saying what he himself feared: that he was a fraud?
Posted on 2/9/18 at 9:33 am to uway
You should probably read Streets of Laredo to help draw that conclusion.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 10:05 am to Loubacca
LD is surely capable of standing on its own. You don’t have an opinion on the question without reference to other novels in the series?
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:19 pm to uway
It certainly does stand on it's own. I referred to the other book because a lot more gets revealed about his character in the next book.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 2:02 pm to uway
Of course he was a hero. He was flawed, but hell who aint.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 3:43 pm to uway
He hates rude behavior in a man and won't abide it.
Seriously though, he was a human being with some very good attributes and some that were kind of shitty. Most heroes were probably the same.
Seriously though, he was a human being with some very good attributes and some that were kind of shitty. Most heroes were probably the same.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 5:14 pm to Methuselah
So he was a hero.
Was he a good man?
Was he a good man?
Posted on 2/10/18 at 1:42 am to uway
No. Neither was Augustus.
They were men who had a job and did it. Nothing they did was heroic. It just was.
That's the brilliance of the novel.
They were men who had a job and did it. Nothing they did was heroic. It just was.
That's the brilliance of the novel.
Posted on 2/10/18 at 2:04 pm to magildachunks
quote:
Nothing they did was heroic.

This post was edited on 2/10/18 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 2/10/18 at 2:41 pm to LSUballs
quote:
They were Texas fricking Rangers. They cleared the southern plains of murdering savages and made it inhabitable. They took the first herd of cattle in history from Texas to Montana, lynching outlaws as they went. They whacked surly bartenders when it was necessary, stole hearts of whores, led men in combat and were general badasses. Heroes, by God
Bravo!!
BUT, the thing is, Call LIKED doing all those things. Gus made that point continuously in various ways.
When Call was given 17 years of chances to face something he didn’t like, he chickened out. That’s why Gus wouldn’t leave him alone about it. He knew how wrong, cowardly, and unlike his friend it was.
I don’t know that all of the heroic things he did offset that one failure, when you take stock of his life (up to the end of Lonesome Dove).
Gus was a flat-out hero, shying from nothing save work, but even doing that well when necessary.
Posted on 2/11/18 at 4:23 pm to uway
I think Gus and Woodrow together make one near perfect man, at least for those times. Gus had the tender heart and the kindness and Woodrow had the ambition and drive. Both had great fighting abilities.
Sometimes I wonder which of them was the better man of action. Gus was off the charts when he took out those comencheros and in the books at least he has excellent eyesight and aim. Call seemed better in a one on one fight going by the way he almost killed that army guy that was whipping Newt. And I think he had better leadership qualities.
Sometimes I wonder which of them was the better man of action. Gus was off the charts when he took out those comencheros and in the books at least he has excellent eyesight and aim. Call seemed better in a one on one fight going by the way he almost killed that army guy that was whipping Newt. And I think he had better leadership qualities.
Posted on 2/11/18 at 5:29 pm to LSUballs
quote:
quote:
Nothing they did was heroic.
They were Texas fricking Rangers. They cleared the southern plains of murdering savages and made it inhabitable. They took the first herd of cattle in history from Texas to Montana, lynching outlaws as they went. They whacked surly bartenders when it was necessary, stole hearts of whores, led men in combat and were general badasses. Heroes, by God.
they stole cattle from other owners ... i would assume many of the indians they killed weren't necessarily 'savages' so much as people defending their land ... and he did not claim newt as his own when he probably would've married the woman had she not been a whore ... those attributes do not a 'hero' make ... brave & courageous, without a doubt ... skilled leader, without a doubt ... his and gus' character are much more complex than a simple label like 'hero' ...
Posted on 2/11/18 at 7:28 pm to tiderider
You’re in way over your head gump.
They “stole” cattle from that piece of shite mexican Pedro Flores who had previously stolen the cattle from Texas. So they were actually recovering cattle
Awe wee, how sweet. You’re living in the greatest civilization in the history of the world thanks to men like Cpt. Woodrow F Call and Augustas McCray. Your kind can even marry now. You could practice a little more gratitude.
Well Maggy WAS a whore. And she slung the poon to Jake Spoon and every other jingling spur on the trail. For money. Should Call have done right by Newt? Absolutely. That was his main flaw in character. But as previously mentioned heroes have flaws.
The definition of hero:
quote:
they stole cattle from other owners ...
They “stole” cattle from that piece of shite mexican Pedro Flores who had previously stolen the cattle from Texas. So they were actually recovering cattle
quote:
i would assume many of the indians they killed weren't necessarily 'savages' so much as people defending their land
Awe wee, how sweet. You’re living in the greatest civilization in the history of the world thanks to men like Cpt. Woodrow F Call and Augustas McCray. Your kind can even marry now. You could practice a little more gratitude.
quote:
and he did not claim newt as his own when he probably would've married the woman had she not been a whor
Well Maggy WAS a whore. And she slung the poon to Jake Spoon and every other jingling spur on the trail. For money. Should Call have done right by Newt? Absolutely. That was his main flaw in character. But as previously mentioned heroes have flaws.
The definition of hero:
quote:
he·ro 'hiro/Submit noun 1. a person who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. "a war hero" synonyms: brave person, brave man/woman, man/woman of courage, man/woman of the hour, lionheart,
This post was edited on 2/11/18 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 2/11/18 at 7:37 pm to LSUballs
eh, i've read the book a few times and have watched the film probably twice as many times as you ... my comment isn't about the current political direction nor a progressively slanted defense of native americans nor an attempt to discredit the achievement of dead, white american men ... i simply prefer to use some rational thinking when analyzing the characters, instead of blindly bowing down to them ... but i see you prefer the latter ...
nonetheless, it's a great novel and story, and the greatest western ever ...

nonetheless, it's a great novel and story, and the greatest western ever ...


This post was edited on 2/11/18 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 2/11/18 at 7:48 pm to tiderider
quote:
. i simply prefer to use some rational thinking when analyzing the characters, instead of blindly bowing down to them ... but i see you prefer the latter

I appreciate and identify with both perspectives.
Funnily enough, Gus and Call kind of overtly give us both of those perspectives in the book.
Posted on 2/11/18 at 7:49 pm to LSUballs
quote:
Well Maggy WAS a whore. And she slung the poon to Jake Spoon and every other jingling spur on the trail
Come on son. She was a victim of circumstances and practically begged Call to save her from them.
Posted on 2/11/18 at 7:53 pm to tiderider
quote:
ive read the book a few times and have watched the film probably twice as many times as you
Lol. Keep thinking that.
quote:
i simply prefer to use some rational thinking when analyzing the characters,
You simply prefer to ignore the literal definition of the word hero and are apparently clueless about the characters who personify it. If Call and Gus aren’t the heroes of Lonesome Dove who is? Lippy? Rosco? The poor, oppressed Blue Duck?
Posted on 2/11/18 at 7:58 pm to LSUballs
quote:
You simply prefer to ignore the literal definition of the word hero and are apparently clueless about the characters who personify it. If Call and Gus aren’t the heroes of Lonesome Dove who is? Lippy? Rosco? The poor, oppressed Blue Duck?
cause that's what i said and implied, isn't it, slick ...
i'm out ... have a good evening ...
Posted on 2/11/18 at 8:03 pm to tiderider
Newt? Clara? dumbass Bob? Jake Spoon? Who is the hero of the novel? 

Posted on 2/11/18 at 8:16 pm to LSUballs
quote:
Who is the hero of the novel?
Gus
Call is a tragic figure.
Back to top
