- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:24 pm to RogerTheShrubber
in·ter·fere
?in(t)?r'fir/Submit
verb
1.
prevent (a process or activity) from continuing or being carried out properly.
in·put
'in?po?ot/Submit
noun
noun: input; plural noun: inputs
1.
what is put in, taken in, or operated on by any process or system.
"perceptions and sensory input"
a contribution of work, information, or material.
As you can now see, the difference between providing input and interfering is night and day.
Your rudimentary English language lesson is done for the day. Move along.
?in(t)?r'fir/Submit
verb
1.
prevent (a process or activity) from continuing or being carried out properly.
in·put
'in?po?ot/Submit
noun
noun: input; plural noun: inputs
1.
what is put in, taken in, or operated on by any process or system.
"perceptions and sensory input"
a contribution of work, information, or material.
As you can now see, the difference between providing input and interfering is night and day.
Your rudimentary English language lesson is done for the day. Move along.
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:27 pm to RB10
: to interpose in a way that hinders or impedes : come into collision or be in opposition
2 : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in walking or running —used especially of horses
3 : to enter into or take a part in the concerns of others
4 : to act reciprocally so as to augment, diminish, or otherwise affect one another —used of waves
Boom
2 : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in walking or running —used especially of horses
3 : to enter into or take a part in the concerns of others
4 : to act reciprocally so as to augment, diminish, or otherwise affect one another —used of waves
Boom
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
to interpose in a way that hinders or impedes : come into collision or be in opposition
You do realize that this, from the primary definition, proves my point, right?
I'm guessing you don't.
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 11:36 pm
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:40 pm to BayouBoogie
If you think that will be good enough for Special Ed, you are fooling yourself.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:40 pm to RB10
quote:
You do realize that this, from the primary definition, proves my point, right?
It does not.
An offensive and defensive coordinators plans are contingent on the game plan. First and foremost. It is not created in a vacuum.
Every coordinator in America changes their plans to fit into the overall strategy, this is revised throughout the game. This will always be done with input from both.
No coordinator in the country has total control of their strategy. It should be challenged or the head coach is derilect in his duty.
Now, the degree of input is something totally different. If the head coach is overriding continually, then he's not just interfering, he's coopted the entire process
This is what some people think Orgeron did to Canada
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:45 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Now, the degree of input is something totally different. If the head coach is overriding continually, then he's not just interfering, he's coopted the entire process
Interfere is to input as coopt is to interfere. Maybe that will help you.
The notion that all head coaches "interfere" is just flat out wrong.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:46 pm to RB10
quote:
The notion that all head coaches "interfere" is just flat out wrong.
100% of them do
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:46 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I think An issue is that O lacked a fundamental understanding of his own offense when making fundamental changes.
Motions weren’t just a minor aspect of Canada’s offense. When you get blown out 37-7, telling the offense just to slow down and simplify isn’t the answer. Thats what Les did for years and it didn’t get us anywhere.
Motions weren’t just a minor aspect of Canada’s offense. When you get blown out 37-7, telling the offense just to slow down and simplify isn’t the answer. Thats what Les did for years and it didn’t get us anywhere.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:49 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
100% of them do
Ignorant.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:51 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Motions weren’t just a minor aspect of Canada’s offense. When you get blown out 37-7, telling the offense just to slow down and simplify isn’t the answer. Thats what Les did for years and it didn’t get us anywhere.
The problem we were having was the offensive penalties. I'm not sure if the players couldn't grasp it or they just weren't getting it right.
Slowing down tempo is a pretty huge deal for Canada. I think O just fricked up the hire
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:59 pm to RogerTheShrubber
False start and illegal shift weren’t even our biggest issue.
We had more holding than illegal shifts and false starts combined.
It wasn’t just the offense. We’re were getting straight up beat and penalties like holding and illegal blocks are a natural result.
And we took out the motion and the play didn’t improve. We still got no push and got beat on the OLine.
And early one it wasn’t just youth. There was 3 returning starters and a 3rd year sophmore on the line. Only 1 position was held by a true freshmen.
We also had a ton of penalties on special teams and on defense.
Overall as a team where were sloppy as hell and we looked unfocused and unmotivated. Somewhere along the way that got blamed on Canada.
Instead of the guy who’s job it is almost exclusively to motivate and focuse the team.
We had more holding than illegal shifts and false starts combined.
It wasn’t just the offense. We’re were getting straight up beat and penalties like holding and illegal blocks are a natural result.
And we took out the motion and the play didn’t improve. We still got no push and got beat on the OLine.
And early one it wasn’t just youth. There was 3 returning starters and a 3rd year sophmore on the line. Only 1 position was held by a true freshmen.
We also had a ton of penalties on special teams and on defense.
Overall as a team where were sloppy as hell and we looked unfocused and unmotivated. Somewhere along the way that got blamed on Canada.
Instead of the guy who’s job it is almost exclusively to motivate and focuse the team.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 12:02 am to SammyTiger
People complain about Troy, that wasn't the worst loss. It was MSU. The team was totally out of sorts and not motivated
Posted on 1/23/18 at 12:04 am to RogerTheShrubber
Well I mean When literally every aspect of a team sucks
Maybe point a finger at the leader of the team?
And what did he do to improve the team afterwards?
O gets so much credit for the turnaround after Troy, it’s like propel forget we didn’t already have an embarrassing loss on the record.
Maybe point a finger at the leader of the team?
And what did he do to improve the team afterwards?
O gets so much credit for the turnaround after Troy, it’s like propel forget we didn’t already have an embarrassing loss on the record.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 6:12 am to stephendomalley
It all depends on who the quarterback is and how good he is. Isn't that kind of common-sense? Why did we need a thread for this? I don't get it.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 6:15 am to RB10
quote:
He's going to let his coordinators coach and not interfere. He promised, again.
If O does that, he'll be the first head coach ever in history to do that loon.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 7:38 am to stephendomalley
I also think you should play "to win" but people will scrutinize that decision also. I thought O should have went for the td against ND but at the same time I understood what he was thinking with the field goal. The problem with O's decision to kick a field goal was the defense had done a poor job of stopping ND on their previous possession and the defense looked tired. There are plenty of coaches that "play it safe", hell, saban is that way, he admitted in NC game he didn't like the play call at the end that led to the td for the win. Lincoln Riley did it to the heisman trophy winner in overtime. There are plenty of coaches that do that, I don't agree with it but that's the facts.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 8:09 am to des4271
He didn't trust Guice ot the Oline on 4th and goal on the 6 inch line in the Bowl game, so there is that..........
Posted on 1/23/18 at 8:52 am to BayouBoogie
quote:
But when the coach asks them what happened with the play
As long as Steve E is asking the questions, I’m okay with it. If Special Ed is, we have issues even CheeriOs can’t ignore.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 8:53 am to stephendomalley
Uh O doesn't trust himself.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News