Started By
Message
locked post

Poliboard lawyers: Steinle related?

Posted on 12/6/17 at 6:44 pm
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
32594 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 6:44 pm
Can the family sue the city and it’s officals for damages? By disregarding federal law (sanctuary city), the city of SF created the circumstances that lead to Kate’s death, yes?

I’m asking out of ignorance on the subject and am not trolling to fire up people about the Kate Steinle case.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36237 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 6:49 pm to
Yes. CA likely has a state tort claims act that provides for liability against a municipality based on gross negligence. They also will likely file a 42 U.S.C. 1983 action for a violation of their daughter's civil rights. There are probably other causes of action as well, but the two above would be the most relevant.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27161 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 6:50 pm to
Very highly unlikely.

See: LINK

ETA after above post: I also find it highly unlikely that any court would consider their actions gross negligence.

ETA2: I would like to hear an explanation of this, as I can't conceive of a non spurious argument for how the state violated her civil rights: "They also will likely file a 42 U.S.C. 1983 action for a violation of their daughter's civil rights."
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 6:53 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48668 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 6:50 pm to
Might be hard to prove "but for" cause.
Posted by MajorTaylor
Member since Aug 2017
217 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 6:52 pm to
Any legal victory is possible. But in light of the fact that Zarate had no record of violence AND the shooting was ruled an accident, imo it is a huge stretch to say that the City of SF should have known that an individual with no history of violence would accidentally shoot someone and is thus responsible for the accidental shooting death.

You could argue that HAD they turned over Zarate to ICE Zarate would not have accidentally shot someone in SF. But that assumes that Zarate would not have made it back into the country after being deported and the fact is he'd already accomplished that numerous times.

Is a police officer who fails to arrest someone on a marijuana possession and only hits them with a lesser charge responsible for a murder the individual commits the next day and might not have committed had the cop arrested the individual for possession of weed?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram