- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gun control lobby going after muzzleloaders now?
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:23 pm
I thought they said muzzleloaders were the ONLY weapon protected by the 2nd amendment. Get your shite together Dems.
Apparently someone is working on a suppressor for a muzzleloader and that means that gangs will start roaming the streets looking like 1776 around here.
I did find it funny that he mentions that if the D.C. sniper had a silenced muzzleloader there would be no telling what kind of carnage they would have caused. I just get a mental picture of the kid in the trunk, trying to reload a fricking MUZZLELOADER.
Tucker
Apparently someone is working on a suppressor for a muzzleloader and that means that gangs will start roaming the streets looking like 1776 around here.
I did find it funny that he mentions that if the D.C. sniper had a silenced muzzleloader there would be no telling what kind of carnage they would have caused. I just get a mental picture of the kid in the trunk, trying to reload a fricking MUZZLELOADER.
Tucker
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:42 pm to Rougarou13
SilencerCo came out with a regulator for a muzzleloader. It's not called a silencer because a muzzleloader is not considered firearm by the ATF.
Someone did an accuracy video a few weeks ago with it on YouTube and it was pretty poor.
Just at the DC sniper statement
Someone did an accuracy video a few weeks ago with it on YouTube and it was pretty poor.
Just at the DC sniper statement
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:43 pm to Rougarou13
these people have reached a new level of retardation
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:48 pm to Rougarou13
As someone who is really into traditional weapons (sidelock muzzleloaders & longbows), this really sucks.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:52 pm to Rougarou13
Supressors are bad enough to clean with modern propellants. Black powder crud? Nah.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:52 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
longbows)
what range was Paddock shooting from?
how much damage could one do shooting arrows down on people at night before somebody realized shite was going down?
time to ban longbows
Posted on 11/17/17 at 11:56 pm to Rougarou13
Someone called a local radio talk show about this. I thought they were drunk and had it all screwed up. Especially after the said about the silencer.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:09 am to Rougarou13
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms or form private armies.
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
just an example of the plutocracy at work.. large campaign donations do wonders to shift policy in a corporations favor
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
just an example of the plutocracy at work.. large campaign donations do wonders to shift policy in a corporations favor
This post was edited on 11/18/17 at 12:16 am
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:16 am to Rougarou13
quote:
Apparently someone is working on a suppressor for a muzzleloader and that means that gangs will start roaming the streets looking like 1776 around here.
Preorder is avalable now but very expensive, innacurate, and a bitch to maintain (clean). LINK
Black powder revolvers have always been cheap and avaliable online without any sort of background check, wonder why they never caught on with the crips?
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:21 am to Rougarou13
They think silencers are the danger, Mel Gibson and his sons didn't need silencers against the Red Coats. LINK
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:25 am to bmy
You probably need to bone up on your Supreme Court baw... Because you're looking pretty uneducated right now.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:27 am to bmy
quote:
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms or form private armies.
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
The Supreme Court begs to differ.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:08 am to bmy
quote:
was intended as a right guaranteed to a state.
2nd= right of the PEOPLE
10th= are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Notice the founders thought those words were two different things?
You know we have these wonderful pages written of the minutes during the Constitutional convention. People should read them. It explains exactly what and why they wrote the Constitution the way they did.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:24 am to bmy
quote:about that
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms
quote:
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:27 am to rooster108bm
District of Columbia v. Heller2008
Supreme Court ruled that the 2nd amendment is an individual right
Supreme Court ruled that the 2nd amendment is an individual right
Posted on 11/18/17 at 2:20 am to bmy
quote:
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
Wrong. It's OK, though. I know words are hard to understand.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 2:29 am to bmy
The entire bill of rights are rights to individuals
Posted on 11/18/17 at 4:21 am to bmy
quote:
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms or form private armies.
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
Exhibit A of how stupidity is the true enemy of freedom.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 4:46 am to TrueTiger
Stupid gonna stupe.
MAGA
MAGA
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News