Started By
Message

re: Court Rules World War I Memorial with Cross Violates US Constitution Offensive to Atheists

Posted on 10/21/17 at 9:42 am to
Posted by LSU2a
SWLA to Dallas
Member since Aug 2012
2851 posts
Posted on 10/21/17 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Get out of here with that load of crap. Your words are hollow. The land was donated. Had cross on it. Government doesn't have to keep it. A cross is only a decoration to an atheist because it has no meaning. Government can put amy decoration on any government land. The government cannot start or legislate a state religion. You're lame reasoning is lame.


You seem to be offended that I hold a view contrary to yours lol. I think someone purchasing the land and keeping the cross in tact would be a wonderful compromise.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17494 posts
Posted on 10/21/17 at 9:51 am to
quote:

You seem to be offended that I hold a view contrary to yours lol.

I am offended at your feelings of being offended but glad to see you aren't as lame as you originally posted and agree with me. Disposing of the land isn't a compromise as you think. Compromise would be the atheists accept the cross as it is a decoration and not a religious statement because they don't believe religion is real.

Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 10/21/17 at 9:54 am to
quote:

LSU2a


I mean, I don't walk by depictions of Buddha or Ganesh and get offended, regardless of whether they are on public land.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram