Started By
Message
locked post

NAFTA Update: Likely ‘Loggerheads’ to be Announced At 3:00pm

Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:42 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119500 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:42 am
LINK


quote:

NAFTA Round #4 negotiations have been ongoing and resulting in little progress on the serious issues surrounding the three nation trade pact.

Word from behind the scenes, and off-the-record, finds several insiders with the opinion that the decision by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce lobbying group to conflict with President Trump and the U.S. trade team has backfired.

U.S. CoC President Tom Donohue made the decision to align in common cause with Canada and Mexico, against the interests of the U.S., and go public with his attacks against the U.S. negotiating team, the administration and President Trump personally.

Following the confrontational approach by the largest DC lobbying group, the U.S. team asked Canada to take their protectionist trade restrictions off the Dairy and Poultry sectors. Canada was adamant they will never leave their agriculture unprotected, and rejected any consideration of open trade discussion toward those sectors.

The U.S. is standing firm on three elements that Mexico and Canada are dead-set against:


1. A proposal that NAFTA be revisited every 5 years with measured way-points to ensure equity in trade position along with updates, if needed, to fast changing sectors.

2. A proposal to change the rules of origin to ensure that around 70% of automotive parts used in manufacturing actually come from inside the three-nation trade block (not Asia). Currently most cars built in Mexico, sent to the U.S., use Chinese parts.

3. A proposal that U.S. companies have preferential treatment for U.S. government taxpayer contracts. This keeps U.S. government stimulus spending inside the U.S. economy. [Canada and Mexico want access to U.S. contracts and U.S. taxpayers expenditures to expand their own economy.]

Canada and Mexico have stated their joint intention to use the DC lobbying groups, including the U.S Chamber of Commerce, to purchase American politicians, block the U.S. trade proposals and increase pressure on President Trump to comply with their demands.

Apparently this CanaMex hostile approach -and alignment with Tom Donohue- does not sit well with President Trump. It should be noted that Chamber President Tom Donohue and Mitch McConnell are best friends and the majority of McConnell’s incumbent campaign funds comes directly from Donohue.

quote:

VIA REUTERS – U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, Mexican Economy Minister Ildefonso Guajardo and Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland are scheduled to meet and take stock of the negotiations before issuing statements at a joint event at 3 p.m. (1900 GMT). They later plan to separately brief media.(link)

Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51818 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:44 am to
I mean, it's like negotiators before this never used common fricking sense.
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:46 am to
TRUMP
R
U
M
P
Posted by fjlee90
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2016
7867 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Tom Donohue


Poor chap. I guess we just figured out who Mr. President will be breaking next.

I guess looking at what he did to Hillary, Megyn Kelly, and the NFL wasn't enough for him to understand.

Drain it.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

1. A proposal that NAFTA be revisited every 5 years with measured way-points to ensure equity in trade position along with updates, if needed, to fast changing sectors.



Seems like a fine idea. I'd probably go with 7 or 8 years.

quote:

2. A proposal to change the rules of origin to ensure that around 70% of automotive parts used in manufacturing actually come from inside the three-nation trade block (not Asia). Currently most cars built in Mexico, sent to the U.S., use Chinese parts.



This is absolutely a good idea.

quote:

3. A proposal that U.S. companies have preferential treatment for U.S. government taxpayer contracts. This keeps U.S. government stimulus spending inside the U.S. economy. [Canada and Mexico want access to U.S. contracts and U.S. taxpayers expenditures to expand their own economy.]



I'm fine with Canadian and Mexican firms getting to bid on US gov contracts. As long as US firms can do the same for theirs.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36534 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 11:07 am to
Put the USA first
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 11:12 am to
Good grief. Of course Canada and Mexico are fighting to keep status quo. Clinton gave them so much of our potential wealth for nothing. NAFTA is wealth-redistribution.
Posted by bobby_3_sticks
Member since Oct 2017
245 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 11:22 am to
didn't the original deal take like 5 years to put together?
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13519 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 11:27 am to
Libtards being told that they now must support the U.S. Chamber of Commerce GOPe bastion:
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13519 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 11:34 am to
Canada and Mexico after the jobs flow back to America after NAFTA's demise:
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13519 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 4:04 pm to
Bump.

Did it happen?

Or are they still negotiating?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram