- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
bobby_3_sticks
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 245 |
| Registered on: | 10/4/2017 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Forum
Message
re: Do any former libertarians feel ideologically lost?
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/18/17 at 11:25 am to Collegedropout
yes. I was pretty hard core libertarian 20-35 or so. I still really like libertarianism but i find it unrealistic. I still clutch to many of those beliefs but I lost my idealogical underpinnings.
re: Were the late 90's/early 2000's the worst era for music?
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/18/17 at 11:23 am to The Seaward
quote:
Perfect From Now On
Keep it Like a Secret
Emergency and I
In the Aeroplane Over the Sea
Lonesome Crowded West
The Moon and Antarctica
OK Computer
Kid A
The Soft Bulletin
Yankee Hotel Foxtrot
This +
interpol
spoon
white stripes
the avalanches
the strokes
moby - play
massive attack
air
belle and sebastian
IMHO, music just has improved since 1990. While you have better years than others, it consisently has been on an upslope.
re: IMO, Trump is in MAJOR political danger. Re: Obamacare.
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/18/17 at 12:37 am to GumboPot
quote:
I don’t understand this move. If this bill passes congress and Trump signs it, not good. That’s a MAJOR campaign promise broken.
lets see what you say when he signs it.
He is going to sign it. he will sign anything that hits his desk.
re: Trump to widow of Sgt. La David Johnson: 'He knew what he signed up for'
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 11:25 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
"he knew what he signed up for, but it still hurts"
It's equivalent to saying "death is a part of war, but it is still a tragedy".
Do you honestly think trump was trying to be a dick to his wife? Really? It's an out of context quote.
But is just a big old frick you in my opinion. Not just here, but everywhere.
Go about life without saying but, or its college cousin - however.
Instead, either outright agree or disagree.
re: The most pathetic media gotcha in history was not against a republican, but this
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 6:53 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
To make matters worse, his response was what was criticized, not the question itself
he fricked up that question big time. We spent almost an hour going through this particular question when I was at LSU.
He could have knocked it out of the park, but he whiffed.
re: Alabama Senate Race a Dead Heat
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 6:07 pm to Loserman
quote:
Possibly, but only because it is a Special election.
its still an election.
I think it would be bad for the dems to win this seat, and I would like a democratically controlled senate. Why?
1) it might diminish the chance that bannon-ite primaries win next spring, which I think helps the dems
2) false sense of security
3) seat is only open for less than a year
re: Alabama Senate Race a Dead Heat
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 5:35 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
Fake news. Moore will mop the floor with him.
moore is going to win, but it won't be a thrashing like it should be. More like 8-10pts, and not 35pts
re: Early Senate '18 map show Reps picking up 6 seats.
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 5:25 pm to Sentrius
quote:
Missouri is a definite bet and McCaskill is good as gone.
That state has swung crazy hard to the right the past few years.
Yeah, she has a tough fight ahead in MO. MO has always been a tad strange electorally though. And 2018 has the makings for an unusual election, either way.
re: Me Too
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 5:11 pm to Jax-Tiger
quote:
I see a lot of people posting #metoo on Facebook to indicate that they have been sexually harassed.
Or sexually assaulted.
I am seeing a ton of it. Most of what i see people are actually telling their stories. Or at least my facebook friends are. And some of them are a bit rough, most are rape or date rape stories. I saw one pretty depressing molestation story.
re: Early Senate '18 map show Reps picking up 6 seats.
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 5:07 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:
Normally true. But 10 DNC states were won by trump. And DNC stand of no compromise combined with DNC leadership is not promising for these seats. Expect GOP gains in Senate. 11 Might be as unlikely as President Trump!
Yeah, we don't know what is going to happen here. this is what I love about politics.
The reality is the only thing working in the Rs favor right now is the map. And in 2016, we found out that maps don't always work the way they are supposed to.
The three big things that pop out to me are...
* What role will trump and congress's unpopularity play in the election?
* what will happen in the primary challenges? Will that provide a stronger or weaker candidate?
* What happens with tax reform? This is probably the biggest risk. It could make or break the election.
And while the map is favorable to Rs, the dems also have a few spots they think they might be able to pick off - AZ and NV, outside chance in nebraska.
My guess is that the Rs will pick up a seat or two. Probably winning 2-3 dem held seats (ND/MT/IN) and then lose a seat or two (AZ, NV).
Who knows though? The Rs really need a strong election this cycle though. 2020 map is almost all R, and with it being a presidential year it could be a big election. And then 2022, the map also has some states the Ds think they can pick off.
re: Sen Alexander tn-gope saves obamacare
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 4:13 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
This has already been discussed
no, it wasn't discussed. There was a thread started though
re: Early Senate '18 map show Reps picking up 6 seats.
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 4:10 pm to gthog61
quote:
You don't know anything about which seats are open do you?
there is only one open seat in 2018.
the map definitely favors republicans. But history favors the democrats, both in terms of incumbent party losing seats plus unfavorable presidents losing a lot of seats.
And throw in primary challenges, and boom, it starts to get dicey for republicans.
We will have to wait and see though. Tax reform and russia will play into it. If I was a republican, I would be a bit nervous about how it plays out.
re: Early Senate '18 map show Reps picking up 6 seats.
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 3:22 pm to Sentrius
quote:
11 seats is very unlikely.
this far out any sort of projection is foolish, especially since there are primary challenges being lined up against several Rs.
Oh, and the presidential party usually loses senate seats at the mid terms. So 11 seats is probably unrealistic, 8 is probably a pipe dream. Rs should be ecstatic if they hold their current majority.
re: Selling my house. Why do I have to pay the buyer's agent?
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 3:15 pm to lynxcat
quote:
Everyone can agree that it is ripe for disruption. The profession will go the way of the taxi driver and I’m excited for it.
the profession will not go away anytime soon. Real estate agents provide all sorts of value to potential buyers. They provide opinions about locations or things to consider, they also can help with picking neighborhoods.
With that said, sellers agents are paid far too much to do far too little.
I would imagine the model will eventually be that sellers will pay an upfront fee for listing the house, and then a small commission to sellers agent (1%) and then sellers will have to fork over some $$ for help.
re: Why won't these celebrities name their rapists/abusers?
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 2:51 pm to ell_13
they probably they signed contracts stating they wouldn't disclose accuser's name.
re: CNN: Bipartisan Healthcare deal reached
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 2:27 pm to bamarep
quote:
Geez, I must have missed where TWO fricking Senators can decide the fate of tax money and healthcare right by their lonesome.
well it might very well collapse, but if murray is signing up for it she can get most if not all the dems on board, Alexander will probably only to deliver 5-10 votes from Rs.
Its very doable fix.
CNN: Bipartisan Healthcare deal reached
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 2:20 pm
Its CNN
quote:
Sens. Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray have reached a deal "in principle" to restore Obamacare cost-sharing reduction payments for two years in exchange for more state flexibility in Obamacare, according to two Senate aides.
quote:
The deal would make it easier for states to obtain waivers to customize the Affordable Care Act rules to their needs. Alaska and Minnesota, for instance, have received permission to use federal funds for reinsurance programs that reduce premiums. States have complained that applying for waivers is a long and complicated process.
The agreement would also allow all Obamacare enrollees to sign up for so-called catastrophic plans, which have lower premiums but have higher deductibles. Right now, these policies are only open to those under 30.
re: Trump warns John McCuck: I fight back and it won't be pretty."
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 2:00 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Why is it always Trump who is supposed to back down, or compromise?
1) he never backs down, part of his success and failure
2) he usually picks the fight
3) he doesn't let the fight die
quote:
It's one thing for McCain to not like Trump, it's an entirely different matter when he goes out of his way to give someone a negative quote everytime they ask him for one about Trump.

re: Trump warns John McCuck: I fight back and it won't be pretty."
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 1:42 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
There is no if, McCain is a piece of shite who's pride got hurt and he is putting that ahead of what's best for America. He won't ever vote yes on any Trump supported bill.
I think he could get behind tax reform. But he won't if he is engaged in a battle with trump.
It is stupid of trump to pick this fight with mccain. And just as stupid to pick a fight with corker.
re: How Hillary can still become President
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 1:39 pm to Zach
this scenario is really unlikely, but if you end up with a ryan or hatch presidency, I wouldn't be surprised if they selected a moderate dem as their VP.
re: The Dow reaches 23,000
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 1:38 pm to LSURussian
quote:
So you think only the top 1% has money in 401(k) plans?
Most americans don't put anything in their 401k
That is the reality. Most people aren't saving for retirements. So a high stock market is probably not going to be a big boost for trump.
Now if GDP growth is over 3% in 2019/20 and russian amounts to nothing, Trump wins easy.
re: Trump will likely be choosing new fed chair within 2 weeks. Could be big deal
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 1:32 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This is going to be a big deal. I can't imagine Yellen will get renewed. Taylor might wreck markets though as he is going raise rates, but who knows if trump is aware of that particular linkage.
Just please don't be Cohn.
Just please don't be Cohn.
re: Trump warns John McCuck: I fight back and it won't be pretty."
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 12:47 pm to bamarep
quote:
Trump warns John McCuck: I fight back and it won't be pretty."
It is goign to be tough for mccain to lose this battle. First off, he has a lot less to lose. And 2nd off, he is going to die. he cares about his legacy.
And trump needs him for tax reform. The margin for passage is narrow. And mccain won't have to bear the koch brother consequences if he votes no, since he is basically a dead man walking.
re: NAFTA Update: Likely ‘Loggerheads’ to be Announced At 3:00pm
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 12:45 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Uh, we traded with Mexico and Canada before NAFTA. You think we would stop trading now with them if NAFTA is annulled?
No, but it would definitely reduce trade to both countries.
re: NAFTA Update: Likely ‘Loggerheads’ to be Announced At 3:00pm
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 12:44 pm to teke184
I think remittances are like $50B a year.
So nothing compared to the trade, and reality is that there is no way to stop remittances.
So nothing compared to the trade, and reality is that there is no way to stop remittances.
re: NAFTA Update: Likely ‘Loggerheads’ to be Announced At 3:00pm
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 12:30 pm to The Maj
quote:
I know it is far more complicated than this, but who has more to lose if NAFTA goes away? The U.S. loses VERY little if this agreement ceases to exist...
Some of the things Canada does, especially in its agricultural protectionism is downright criminal...
The US consumer would lose if Nafta went away. CHeap produce (i.e. red peppers in December for $.50) for one.
Canada and Mexico are our two largest trading partners, so killing NAFTA would definitely impact that. We do have a trading deficit with both though.
I would think that mexico has the most to lose if nafta was killed.
Also, we need to think about the immigration effects of killing NAFTA. Trade to the US is a huge part of mexico's economy.
re: NAFTA Update: Likely ‘Loggerheads’ to be Announced At 3:00pm
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 11:22 am to GumboPot
didn't the original deal take like 5 years to put together?
re: How many on here now blasting Weinstein, praised Heff?
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 11:21 am to Revelator
quote:
But he still was praised. Especially by leftists publications.
can you link toe effusive praise? He certainly did get long obits but he was a pop culture icon for like 50 years.
re: .
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 11:18 am to BigJim
quote:
There are some detailed tax reform, proposal but no actual bills.
there really isn't much detail here. There is more than the outline, but it isn't particularly detailed. Its 9 pages of what taxes will be eliminated, or curtailed but not really how it is going to be paid for.
LINK
There is a big budget vote this week, which there are no threads on.
re: New fires break out in California as wine country fires dim
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 11:12 am to biggsc
Amazing that people want to blame california and liberals for this.
The reality is that california was in a drought for 5 years, and just came out of it. and then this summer they didn't get much rain.
The reality of the west is wildfires. and while there are things you can do to not have your house destroyed by them, there isn't a ton of stuff you can do to not have them at all.
The reality is that california was in a drought for 5 years, and just came out of it. and then this summer they didn't get much rain.
The reality of the west is wildfires. and while there are things you can do to not have your house destroyed by them, there isn't a ton of stuff you can do to not have them at all.
re: How many on here now blasting Weinstein, praised Heff?
Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 11:05 am to Revelator
When he died, there was quite a lot of stuff that said he was scum FWIW and not worthy of praise.
Popular
2












