Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:245
Registered on:10/4/2017
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
yes. I was pretty hard core libertarian 20-35 or so. I still really like libertarianism but i find it unrealistic. I still clutch to many of those beliefs but I lost my idealogical underpinnings.
quote:

Perfect From Now On
Keep it Like a Secret
Emergency and I
In the Aeroplane Over the Sea
Lonesome Crowded West
The Moon and Antarctica
OK Computer
Kid A
The Soft Bulletin
Yankee Hotel Foxtrot


This +
interpol
spoon
white stripes
the avalanches
the strokes
moby - play
massive attack
air
belle and sebastian

IMHO, music just has improved since 1990. While you have better years than others, it consisently has been on an upslope.
quote:

I don’t understand this move. If this bill passes congress and Trump signs it, not good. That’s a MAJOR campaign promise broken.


lets see what you say when he signs it. :lol:

He is going to sign it. he will sign anything that hits his desk.
quote:

"he knew what he signed up for, but it still hurts"

It's equivalent to saying "death is a part of war, but it is still a tragedy".

Do you honestly think trump was trying to be a dick to his wife? Really? It's an out of context quote.

But is just a big old frick you in my opinion. Not just here, but everywhere.

Go about life without saying but, or its college cousin - however.

Instead, either outright agree or disagree.
quote:

To make matters worse, his response was what was criticized, not the question itself

he fricked up that question big time. We spent almost an hour going through this particular question when I was at LSU.

He could have knocked it out of the park, but he whiffed.

quote:

Possibly, but only because it is a Special election.


its still an election.

I think it would be bad for the dems to win this seat, and I would like a democratically controlled senate. Why?
1) it might diminish the chance that bannon-ite primaries win next spring, which I think helps the dems

2) false sense of security

3) seat is only open for less than a year
quote:

Fake news. Moore will mop the floor with him.


moore is going to win, but it won't be a thrashing like it should be. More like 8-10pts, and not 35pts
quote:


Missouri is a definite bet and McCaskill is good as gone.

That state has swung crazy hard to the right the past few years.

Yeah, she has a tough fight ahead in MO. MO has always been a tad strange electorally though. And 2018 has the makings for an unusual election, either way.

re: Me Too

Posted by bobby_3_sticks on 10/17/17 at 5:11 pm
quote:

I see a lot of people posting #metoo on Facebook to indicate that they have been sexually harassed.


Or sexually assaulted.

I am seeing a ton of it. Most of what i see people are actually telling their stories. Or at least my facebook friends are. And some of them are a bit rough, most are rape or date rape stories. I saw one pretty depressing molestation story.
quote:

Normally true. But 10 DNC states were won by trump. And DNC stand of no compromise combined with DNC leadership is not promising for these seats. Expect GOP gains in Senate. 11 Might be as unlikely as President Trump!


Yeah, we don't know what is going to happen here. this is what I love about politics.

The reality is the only thing working in the Rs favor right now is the map. And in 2016, we found out that maps don't always work the way they are supposed to.

The three big things that pop out to me are...
* What role will trump and congress's unpopularity play in the election?
* what will happen in the primary challenges? Will that provide a stronger or weaker candidate?
* What happens with tax reform? This is probably the biggest risk. It could make or break the election.

And while the map is favorable to Rs, the dems also have a few spots they think they might be able to pick off - AZ and NV, outside chance in nebraska.

My guess is that the Rs will pick up a seat or two. Probably winning 2-3 dem held seats (ND/MT/IN) and then lose a seat or two (AZ, NV).

Who knows though? The Rs really need a strong election this cycle though. 2020 map is almost all R, and with it being a presidential year it could be a big election. And then 2022, the map also has some states the Ds think they can pick off.

quote:

This has already been discussed


no, it wasn't discussed. There was a thread started though
quote:

You don't know anything about which seats are open do you?


there is only one open seat in 2018.

the map definitely favors republicans. But history favors the democrats, both in terms of incumbent party losing seats plus unfavorable presidents losing a lot of seats.

And throw in primary challenges, and boom, it starts to get dicey for republicans.

We will have to wait and see though. Tax reform and russia will play into it. If I was a republican, I would be a bit nervous about how it plays out.
quote:

11 seats is very unlikely.


this far out any sort of projection is foolish, especially since there are primary challenges being lined up against several Rs.

Oh, and the presidential party usually loses senate seats at the mid terms. So 11 seats is probably unrealistic, 8 is probably a pipe dream. Rs should be ecstatic if they hold their current majority.
quote:

Everyone can agree that it is ripe for disruption. The profession will go the way of the taxi driver and I’m excited for it.


the profession will not go away anytime soon. Real estate agents provide all sorts of value to potential buyers. They provide opinions about locations or things to consider, they also can help with picking neighborhoods.

With that said, sellers agents are paid far too much to do far too little.

I would imagine the model will eventually be that sellers will pay an upfront fee for listing the house, and then a small commission to sellers agent (1%) and then sellers will have to fork over some $$ for help.
they probably they signed contracts stating they wouldn't disclose accuser's name.
quote:

Geez, I must have missed where TWO fricking Senators can decide the fate of tax money and healthcare right by their lonesome.


well it might very well collapse, but if murray is signing up for it she can get most if not all the dems on board, Alexander will probably only to deliver 5-10 votes from Rs.

Its very doable fix.

Its CNN
quote:

Sens. Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray have reached a deal "in principle" to restore Obamacare cost-sharing reduction payments for two years in exchange for more state flexibility in Obamacare, according to two Senate aides.

quote:

The deal would make it easier for states to obtain waivers to customize the Affordable Care Act rules to their needs. Alaska and Minnesota, for instance, have received permission to use federal funds for reinsurance programs that reduce premiums. States have complained that applying for waivers is a long and complicated process.
The agreement would also allow all Obamacare enrollees to sign up for so-called catastrophic plans, which have lower premiums but have higher deductibles. Right now, these policies are only open to those under 30.
quote:

Why is it always Trump who is supposed to back down, or compromise?

1) he never backs down, part of his success and failure
2) he usually picks the fight
3) he doesn't let the fight die

quote:

It's one thing for McCain to not like Trump, it's an entirely different matter when he goes out of his way to give someone a negative quote everytime they ask him for one about Trump.


quote:

There is no if, McCain is a piece of shite who's pride got hurt and he is putting that ahead of what's best for America. He won't ever vote yes on any Trump supported bill.


I think he could get behind tax reform. But he won't if he is engaged in a battle with trump.

It is stupid of trump to pick this fight with mccain. And just as stupid to pick a fight with corker.
this scenario is really unlikely, but if you end up with a ryan or hatch presidency, I wouldn't be surprised if they selected a moderate dem as their VP.