Started By
Message

re: Hooray for justice! MAGA! Go Joe go!

Posted on 8/25/17 at 10:15 pm to
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 10:15 pm to
Separates out those that have principles they stick to, and those that are at best just in it for the cult of personality, and at worse, those that are receptive to authoritarian rule.
Posted by rgsa
La.
Member since May 2015
2386 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 7:37 am to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43151 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 7:42 am to
quote:

I don't get why the conservatives love this guy


because he enforces the laws.

quote:

Joe plays extremely fast and loose with the 4th Amendment.


that is a political opinion - not supported by facts


nothing Joe has done re the 4th amendment compares with the prog/DEM/MSM shredding of the 1st and 2nd amendments
This post was edited on 8/26/17 at 7:45 am
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 8:01 am to
quote:

He doesn't get to choose which court orders he follows

Yea, who does he think he is, part of the obama administration?
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71687 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 3:12 pm to
Why do you keep asking people about the Patriot Act?
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

buckeye_vol


Melting over for news....

It's like Vegas Bengal is back in all her tranny glory
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11358 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 3:32 pm to
This thread sure is a display of who places team before country or values.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23385 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

Well then. Law enforcement has almost 3 times more probable cause to pull you over than a female. What do you think about that?


I think your analogy is shitty.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

I don't get why the conservatives love this guy. Joe plays extremely fast and loose with the 4th Amendment.


Exactly. I am happy he lost, but his "trial" was a sham.

He was definitely in office for too long and got borderline corrupt imo. Definitely overplayed his power.
Posted by Bullethead88
Half way between LSU and Tulane
Member since Dec 2009
4202 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 12:16 am to
quote:

quote:
Pardoning him before he was even sentenced is a joke and shows that Trump has no understanding of or respect for the law of this country. 

Melt cuck



Airhead response.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 12:18 am to
quote:


He was definitely in office for too long and got borderline corrupt imo. Definitely overplayed his power.


borderline?

As of June 2014, costs to Maricopa County taxpayers related to Arpaio's and Thomas's failed corruption investigations exceeded $45 million, not including staff time.[103][104]

In February 2010, Pima County Superior Court Judge John S. Leonardo found that Arpaio "misused the power of his office to target members of the Board of Supervisors for criminal investigation".[105]

In 2008, a federal grand jury began an inquiry of Arpaio for abuse of power in connection with an FBI investigation.[106][107] On August 31, 2012, the Arizona U.S. Attorney's office announced that it was "closing its investigation into allegations of criminal conduct" by Arpaio, without filing charges.[108]

Arpaio was investigated for politically motivated and "bogus" prosecutions, which a former U.S. Attorney called "utterly unacceptable".[106][107] Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon called Arpaio's "long list" of questionable prosecutions "a reign of terror".[107]

The targets of Arpaio's alleged abuse of power included:

Phil Gordon, Phoenix Mayor[106]
Dan Saban, Arpaio's 2004 and 2008 opponent for the office of Sheriff of Maricopa County[106]
Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General[106]
David Smith, Maricopa County Manager[106]
The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors[106]
Barbara Mundell, Maricopa Superior Court Presiding Judge[106]
Anna Baca, former Maricopa Superior Court Presiding Judge[109]
Gary Donahoe, Maricopa Superior Court Criminal Presiding Judge[106]
Daniel Pochoda, ACLU attorney[106]
Sandra Dowling, former Maricopa County School Superintendent[107]
Mike Lacey, Editor, Phoenix New Times[107]
As of July 2010, only Sandra Dowling had been successfully prosecuted.[107] Indicted on 25 felony counts, Dowling eventually pleaded guilty to patronage for giving a summer job to her daughter, a single class-2 misdemeanor which was not among the original counts, although as part of the plea bargain she also agreed to recuse herself from the Maricopa County Regional School District. Dowling later filed suit, alleging negligence, malicious prosecution, abuse of process and several constitutional violations, although Arpiao won summary judgment against her claims.[110]

Mike Lacey and Jim Larkin, the founders and leaders of the Phoenix New Times, were arrested after publishing a news article on a grand jury investigation involving Arpaio's office. On the evening that the article was published, Lacey and Larkin were arrested by plainclothes sheriff's deputies, "handcuffed, put in dark SUVs with tinted windows and driven to jail."[111] Following a public uproar over the arrests, all charges were dropped against Lacey and Larkin.[111] Lacey and Larkin filed a federal Section 1983 lawsuit for the violations of their civil rights, and in 2012 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that they could sue the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office for the arrests.[112] In 2013, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors voted to settle the suit for $3.75 million. Lacey and Larkin used the proceeds of the settlement to establish an endowed chair professorship at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication.[111]

An analysis by the Maricopa County Office of Management and Budget, completed in April 2011, found that Arpaio had misspent almost $100 million over the previous 5 years.[117][118][119]

The analysis showed that money from a restricted detention fund which could legally be used only to pay for jail items, such as food, detention officers' salaries, and equipment, was used to pay employees to patrol Maricopa County.[117] The analysis also showed that many sheriff's office employees, whose salaries were paid from the restricted detention fund, were working job assignments different from those recorded in their personnel records. Arpaio's office kept a separate set of personnel books detailing actual work assignments, different from information kept in the county's official human resources records.[118]

Arpaio used the detention fund to pay for investigations of political rivals, as well as activities involving his human-smuggling unit.[117][118]

The analysis also showed a number of inappropriate spending items including a trip to Alaska where deputies stayed at a fishing resort, and trips to Disneyland.[118][120]

Separate investigations by The Arizona Republic uncovered widespread abuse of public funds and county policies by Arpaio's office, including high-ranking employees routinely charging expensive meals and stays at luxury hotels on their county credit cards.[121]

The Republic also found that a restricted jail-enhancement fund was improperly used to pay for out-of-state training, a staff party at a local amusement park, and a $456,000 bus which Arpaio purchased in violation of county procurement rules.[117][122]
This post was edited on 8/27/17 at 12:22 am
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 12:26 am to
quote:


I think your analogy is shitty.


i think it comes down to a basic concept of freedom..

do you think the government should be stopping all people who appear to be muslim at checkpoints and detaining those without proper identification? what about detaining all people who fit the profile of a white nationalist?

i'm sure they'll catch some bad guys. but how much freedom are you willing to permanently lose for the tiny increase in security?
This post was edited on 8/27/17 at 12:27 am
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23385 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:31 am to
quote:



i think it comes down to a basic concept of freedom..

do you think the government should be stopping all people who appear to be muslim at checkpoints and detaining those without proper identification? what about detaining all people who fit the profile of a white nationalist?

i'm sure they'll catch some bad guys. but how much freedom are you willing to permanently lose for the tiny increase in security?


Look another shitty analogy.

The people weren't stopped because they were Hispanic, they were stopped because they broke the law and if there was reasonable suspicion that they may be illegally in the country, they were detained.

Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:35 am to
quote:

The people weren't stopped because they were Hispanic, they were stopped because they broke the law and if there was reasonable suspicion that they may be illegally in the country, they were detained.




Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 7:19 am to
quote:




Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 10:35 am to
quote:


The people weren't stopped because they were Hispanic, they were stopped because they broke the law and if there was reasonable suspicion that they may be illegally in the country, they were detained.


Oh, really? Lots of examples to choose from

Julio Mora, an American citizen, and his legal resident father were cuffed and held for three hours during the MCSO's immigration raid

"That's just normal police work, " Arpaio said following the raid. "Sometimes you do have probable cause, you do take people in for questioning, and they're released."
This post was edited on 8/27/17 at 10:36 am
Posted by half cajun
Katy, TX
Member since Sep 2007
1971 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 10:55 am to
Joe is no hero. He's an authoritarian thug.

LINK /
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
18879 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Bulletthead88


See this you are back after melting on the Help Board. Btw, ShortyRob was never banned.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54754 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 7:20 pm to
Hooray for fake assassination attempts, framed victims, jailed political opponents and a complete disregard for constitutional rights!
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54754 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

The people weren't stopped because they were Hispanic, they were stopped because they broke the law and if there was reasonable suspicion that they may be illegally in the country, they were detained.


Patently false. You're either lying or just made that up feeling like that would be the most right way to have done it and hoping that's how Arpaio did it. He didn't.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram