Started By
Message

re: Should somone who gives up his citizenship be labeled a traitor and charged w/ treason?

Posted on 8/16/17 at 6:16 pm to
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35510 posts
Posted on 8/16/17 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

How is it different on a fundamental level?
They weren't leaving. They wanted to declare a piece of the United States as their own without leaving.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26999 posts
Posted on 8/16/17 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

How is it different on a fundamental level?
They weren't leaving. They wanted to declare a piece of the United States as their own without leaving.



You didn't expect him to know the difference, did you?
Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
14847 posts
Posted on 8/16/17 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

They weren't leaving. They wanted to declare a piece of the United States as their own without leaving.




Calexit??... fricking traitors... let's kill em
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 8/16/17 at 6:29 pm to
That would assume that the United States owned all the states in the 19th Century, which wasn't the case pre-secession.

Also, taking property isn't in the definition of treason.

The definition clearly states that treason involves actively trying to overthrow one's government, which wasn't the case with the Confederates.
This post was edited on 8/16/17 at 6:32 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263293 posts
Posted on 8/16/17 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

They weren't leaving. They wanted to declare a piece of the United States as their own without leaving.


Like a sizable number of Californians
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram