- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: OT Medical Drs - How egregious is misdiagnosising a broken leg as a bruise??
Posted on 8/16/17 at 5:30 pm to TypoKnig
Posted on 8/16/17 at 5:30 pm to TypoKnig
With what I know (obviously not the full story), the Saints have unjustly publicly shamed the two orthopedists.
I'm curious what imaging Breaux had, but stress injuries or fractures can have negative X-rays and it can be difficult to differentiate between the 2 on MRIs (often the fracture line on the T1 images is hard to see for fibulas because of the image slice thickness). Most of the time, it just takes time to truly determine what's going on. Heck, he probably had a stress injury that converted to a fracture because the Saints were pushing him to get back on the field. If I'm one of these two orthopedists, I'm suing the Saints for defamation.
ETA: Just read Breaux's prior fibular fracture was internally fixated (aka he's got hardware). This makes an MR worthless because of artifact, and the sensitivity for fracture pickup on X-rays is much lower. I'm guessing initial X-rays were normal but follow-up films showed the fracture (like I said, time is the true decider). If this is correct, then no orthopedist would have done anything different than what happened.
I'm curious what imaging Breaux had, but stress injuries or fractures can have negative X-rays and it can be difficult to differentiate between the 2 on MRIs (often the fracture line on the T1 images is hard to see for fibulas because of the image slice thickness). Most of the time, it just takes time to truly determine what's going on. Heck, he probably had a stress injury that converted to a fracture because the Saints were pushing him to get back on the field. If I'm one of these two orthopedists, I'm suing the Saints for defamation.
ETA: Just read Breaux's prior fibular fracture was internally fixated (aka he's got hardware). This makes an MR worthless because of artifact, and the sensitivity for fracture pickup on X-rays is much lower. I'm guessing initial X-rays were normal but follow-up films showed the fracture (like I said, time is the true decider). If this is correct, then no orthopedist would have done anything different than what happened.
This post was edited on 8/16/17 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 8/16/17 at 5:53 pm to Parallax
quote:
the Saints have unjustly publicly shamed the two orthopedists.
Every time I heard a local news break on the radio today they said they were fired for misdiagnosis and all that. It makes it sound like malpractice. Certainly if he already had hardware in there it makes it even more difficult.
I understand the stakes are high at this level, but to the general public it sounds really egregious.
I wonder if they did a CT initially?
Posted on 8/16/17 at 10:29 pm to Parallax
Thanks for the update. Something didn't sound right from the beginning of this story, and that makes all of this make more sense. I agree that the Saints unjustly shamed these docs publicly, obviously as an attempt to save face for allowing the media to basically tell the rest of the NFL that they thought the guy who came back to play pro football after breaking his neck was a pussy while openly trying to trade him.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News