Started By
Message

re: Let's discuss the Monty Hall problem (probabilities, odds)

Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:23 am to
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27351 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:23 am to
The easiest way to understand this problem is to stretch it out to the extreme.

Imagine there were 1,000 doors. 1 door had the prize and the 999 other doors had a goat.

Your odds of picking the right door off the bat are very low... 1 / 1,000. So you pick a door.

Now the host opens 998 doors which he knows contain goats. Now there are two doors left, the 1 door the host left and your door.

Your odds don't change to 50/50 just because there are two doors left. You didn't choose between two doors... you chose your door out of 1,000.

So unless you think you picked the right door right off the bat out of 1,000 (which it's extremely unlikely that you did), then you should switch.
This post was edited on 8/12/17 at 8:26 am
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76823 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Your odds don't change to 50/50 just because there are two doors left. You didn't choose between two doors... you chose your door out of 1,000.

I get that. But at this point, you're making a new choice between two doors. The other 998 are irrelevant.
Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
14847 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:30 am to
In scenario 3 which is

GGC

and you picked door 1... he can't show you door 3... your premise is flawed from the outset

The rules are he can't pick your door and he can't show you the car, meaning he can only open door 2 in this scenario
Posted by SlapahoeTribe
Tiger Nation
Member since Jul 2012
12129 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:34 am to
quote:

But at this point, you're making a new choice between two doors. The other 998 are irrelevant.
That's why I don't like explaining it like that. It can be difficult to explain, but I find that once someone finally gets it, they see how natural it is for your odds to go up to 2/3 by switching.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59915 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:36 am to
See I look at it like is a whole new decision. I'm not concerned about the opened doors at that point. They are out of the equation. I think this is one of those things where people just overthink something.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27351 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:37 am to
quote:

I get that. But at this point, you're making a new choice between two doors. The other 998 are irrelevant.
No, it's not a new choice.

If the host eliminated 998 doors and there were two left and a totally new guy walked up not knowing what had just happened and had to pick between doors then he would have a 50/50 chance of picking the right door.

But what he doesn't know is that your door was picked out of 1,000 doors. With this information in hand, he would know that your odds of having picked the door with the prize with your door are astronomically low, and he should choose the other door.

See, just because there are now two doors left doesn't change the fact that the odds that you picked the right door are 0.1% and the odds that you picked the wrong door are 99.9%.
Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
14847 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:45 am to
quote:

See I look at it like is a whole new decision. I'm not concerned about the opened doors at that point. They are out of the equation. I think this is one of those things where people just overthink something.



Your original pick was with 1/3 doors... sticking with that same pick means you still have a 1/3 chance to win because you didn't make a whole new decision
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59915 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:47 am to
Yea and if you switch you have a 1/3 chance as it is only one door out of 3.

Why does the opened door only count to one side?
This post was edited on 8/12/17 at 8:48 am
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:49 am to
Conditional probability; once he opens that door, you gain new information and the probabilities change. Switching gives you a 2 in 3 chance.
Posted by reverendotis
the jawbone of an arse
Member since Nov 2007
4867 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:53 am to
A goat IS what my heart desires.

No shite, my wife and I squabble over getting a pet goat quite often. Actually, I heard I need two of them to keep each other company.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27351 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Yea and if you switch you have a 1/3 chance as it is only one door out of 3. Why does the opened door only count to one side?
Because the host knows where the goats are.

Stretch it out to 1,000 again.

If you pick a door, there is a 0.1% chance that you picked the right door, and a 99.9% chance that the door with the prize is in one of the other 999 doors.

So when the host knowingly eliminates goats from 998 other doors, there is still a 0.1% chance that you picked the right door and a 99.9% chance that the door with the prize is behind the door the host left out of the 999.
This post was edited on 8/12/17 at 8:58 am
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59915 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:58 am to
I'm gonna side with the thousand of PhDs that disagree
That one door out of the 999 doesn't hold the value of 999 doors. That's stupid
Posted by IT_Dawg
Georgia
Member since Oct 2012
22121 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:58 am to
I'm going home with the greatest of all time prizes
Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
14847 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Yea and if you switch you have a 1/3 chance as it is only one door out of 3.

Why does the opened door only count to one side?



Incorrect... he has added new information into the equation by showing you one of the goats

Out of 3 doors, you pick one, and the remaining 2 doors have 2/3 odds combined

When he reveals the goat behind one of those doors, that door's value drops to zero and gets added to the other door... your original pick still has the same odds from the beginning because you havent been able to use the new information yet, and the second door now has it's odds and the goat's door's odds combined


The problem you will have with this is I know I'm 100% correct... watch some YouTube videos on it... you'll get it, I believe in you, Nado
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27351 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 9:00 am to
quote:

I'm gonna side with the thousand of PhDs that disagree That one door out of the 999 doesn't hold the value of 999 doors. That's stupid
Those thousands of phd's have recognized their error in logic and have come around. This isn't really controversial anymore.

They've actually done live experiments testing it and it's 100% true that you should switch.
This post was edited on 8/12/17 at 9:03 am
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59915 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 9:01 am to
Nah I'll pass. I refuse to believe that either door left unopened holds the value of the door that was opened.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27351 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 9:04 am to
Watch this short video. They actually run this experiment using cups and chart the results.

https://youtu.be/o_djTy3G0pg
Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
14847 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 9:05 am to
quote:

I refuse to believe that either door left unopened holds the value of the door that was opened.



Each door has 1/3 odds unopened... your first choice has 1/3 odds... the other 2 combined have 2/3 odds at all times... 1/3+1/3... when he opens the goat, those 2/3 odds combined remain, except there is one less door in the equation, meaning one door has the 2/3 odds to itself
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59915 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 9:07 am to
I understand the theory. But it's still a theory.
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40958 posts
Posted on 8/12/17 at 9:09 am to
Seems pretty easy to understand, not sure why people have such a hard time with it.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram