- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clay Travis issues challenge in response to Martin Luther Cream"s NFL boycott
Posted on 6/8/17 at 10:25 pm to Epic Cajun
Posted on 6/8/17 at 10:25 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
In all likelihood his positives don't outweigh the negatives that he brings to the table. I guess he could make sense as a starter for a team that sucks (the Jets), but the flack you get for signing him isn't worth it if he's going to just ride the bench.
Exactly. He's not blackballed, he just isn't worth the headache. Of course he's better than mike glennon or the dude the Seahawks just signed, but those guys don't come with the baggage; especially for a backup.
Why some of the idiotic talking heads at espn fail to acknowledge that is sickening.
0
Posted on 6/8/17 at 10:36 pm to ballscaster
quote:
The word has more than one specific meaning.
Haha I've haven't heard shite this dumb on OT in a while and that says a lot coming from me.
This post was edited on 6/8/17 at 11:46 pm
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:14 am to ballscaster
quote:So he is racist against white folks?
You just explained it word for word.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 7:54 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:Look the word up. Definition 3. That. The "against white folks" part is not required and is see-through spin.
So he is racist against white folks?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 7:56 am to OweO
quote:Yes it is. Look the word up and read the entire definition.
But it's not slavery when someone has the freedom to make a choice to do something or not.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 7:57 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Look the word up and read the entire definition. You are wrong. The word has little meaning to you because you don't know the meaning.
You're demonstrated why the word
"racist has little meaning. There's nothing racist about what Travis did.
You can't tell the difference between racial and racist.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:03 am to ballscaster
Idk what the 3rd definition of racism is. Would you mind just summarizing it for me please?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:05 am to ballscaster
No, people such as yourself have bastardized the meaning.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:05 am to ReauxlTide222
Nope. Look it up in Webster yourself. It's the only way you'll learn. If I do the work for you, you can't improve.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:07 am to ballscaster
Were you banned?
Man, I'm glad you are back
Man, I'm glad you are back
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:07 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Nah, it's you. I've used the word correctly and even cited the definition used. You people get triggered by this because you internalize virtually all uses of the word ("He said that Travis said something racist. I read Travis. He must be calling me racist!").
No, people such as yourself have bastardized the meaning.
All I'm dealing with is the actual definition of the word in the dictionary, not your feelings.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:07 am to ballscaster
So it's racial prejudice or discrimination...
Which makes you wrong.
Which makes you wrong.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:10 am to Tino
quote:I was banned on calling a guy who said "I hate Muslims and all who are associated with Islam" an Islamophobe and citing the dictionary definition of the word, which means the clock is ticking for me now.
Were you banned?
Man, I'm glad you are back
This board doesn't take kindly to the dictionary. Words like marriage, homophobe, islamophobe, and racism do not carry the definitions that most on this board feel that they should. Not sure why that's my problem, but this isn't my site, so I don't make the rules (up as I go along).
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:11 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:Dude. Stop arguing with me. You can't win. He put $50,000 on the line with the amount of African ancestry in a man's bloodline being the determinant. That's racist in that it is racial discrimination. I am right, and you are wrong. Let it go.
So it's racial prejudice or discrimination...
Which makes you wrong.
This post was edited on 6/9/17 at 8:13 am
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:14 am to ballscaster
Against whites...
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:16 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:Irrelevant. We've already been over this. You're behind. Roll Tide.
Against whites...
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:19 am to ballscaster
Racism is pretty bad. How is the race he is racist against and discriminating against...irrelevant?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:23 am to ballscaster
Are y'all still arguing semantics??
Ballcaster is either trolling the frick out of y'all, or so dumb he's not worth the time.
Either way, move on people!
Ballcaster is either trolling the frick out of y'all, or so dumb he's not worth the time.
Either way, move on people!
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:25 am to ballscaster
quote:
That's racist in that it is racial discrimination
You're a clown.
Page 11 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News