Started By
Message

re: The Inconvenient Truth of the Democratic Party

Posted on 5/24/17 at 5:13 pm to
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

A pattern of continued behavior to entice a group to keep you in power, if it's effective, is control. It's not exclusive to the Dems.
Why is that control and not simply a quid pro quo? Both Dems and poor people get what they want (votes, money)
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50571 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

However I think it's a bit evil how they manipulate the poor.


I started a thread on this very topic years ago when I was going through my conversion from DEM to IND.

I labeled them "Evil Geniuses".
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141573 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

a bit evil


It's more than a bit evil.

I can't think of any thing much more evil.

Telling people how much you care about them while you are living in million dollar homes and sipping expensive wine is pretty sick just to get their votes.

Pretending to care is bad. At least I don't care and I don't pretend.

Hell, most people don't care really as they do absolutely nothing but bitch about problems they perceive to get some warm feeling about themselves.


Most of the libs here for instance.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46704 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Saying "vote for us and we'll give you stuff" doesn't really sound like control to me.




It's how I get my dog to rollover, show him a treat, give him the hand sign and that suckers rolling. No treat and he aint rolling. Reduce government entitlements and the Dims lose a huge portion of their voters.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263330 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Why is that control and not simply a quid pro quo? Both Dems and poor people get what they want (votes, money)


Because the intent is to keep them dependent.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76831 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

is that control and not simply a quid pro quo? Both Dems and poor people get what they want (votes, money)

I'm certainly no liberal but I do agree with you here.

And, I don't see how anyone can argue that today's republican was yesterday's democrat. It's why the solid democrat south is now solid red. Isn't that why LBJ said the south was lost upon signing the Civil Rights Act?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263330 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

Isn't that why LBJ said the south was lost upon signing the Civil Rights Act?





Yep, "I’ll have those n*****s voting Democratic for 200 years,” 

I know lots of racist people who still didn't vote Republican til the 80s
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 5:56 pm
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3219 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

Nah, totally different, but each does off a certain level of control. Slavery is blatant control.


I would suggest that whoever controls the purse strings has complete control...

Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76831 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

know lots of racist people who still didn't vote Republican til the 80s

There are still some conservative democrats, you can see them in state or local elections, but they are the old timers and are dwindling.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263330 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 6:06 pm to
quote:




There are still some conservative democrats, you can see them in state or local elections, but they are the old timers and are dwindling


Yeah, my ex wife's dad said he'd vote for a ****** (referring to Jesse Jackson) before a Republican.

Its changed over the years, I'd say the Democrats racist past can be forgotten though.



Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 6:08 pm to
George Wallace, a Democrat, won 90% of the black vote in the 1982 Alabama gubernatorial. This a mere 19 years after his infamous "Segregation Forever" speech.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

Yeah I mean slavery and giving people money are basically the same thing




Well, slavery and stealing the fruits of other people's labor before redistributing it are at least a step closer together.
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

Saying "vote for us and we'll give you stuff" doesn't really sound like control to me.


If you give them just enough to not have to provide for themselves it can be.

I didn't get a job in highschool until my parents stopped giving me 20 bucks a week. It sucked at first but life became much better having 100 a week to play with. And I felt much less inclined to brown nose to get my handout.

Yes I know some people actually need assistance to survive, but there are many that don't and just accept it and are perfectly content because it's all they've ever known.
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 6:30 pm
Posted by jackmanusc
Columbia, SC
Member since Apr 2012
3947 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 6:11 pm to
Yea after he basically made a 180 degree turn and apologized for it
Posted by Woody Glazer
Member since May 2017
213 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 6:51 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

Yea after he basically made a 180 degree turn and apologized for it



It's amazing how Democrats can get away with such apologies. Men like George Wallace and Robert Byrd say sorry for being two of the biggest supporters of segregation and racism in the 20th century and they are forgiven. Mel Gibson apologizes for a drunken rant against Jews and the man still can never live it down.
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 8:05 pm
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

aren't today's republican ideologies inline with the dem's ideologies from the civil war era?
You wish

Nice lie. The bigger the better
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

Yeah I mean slavery and giving people money are basically the same thing




Of course you know more than a black female professor at Vanderbilt...
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
6100 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

I certainly believe the architects behind leftist policy realize they are creating a dependent class and its by design


You are right!

Just google Francis Fox Priven and Richard Cloward.
From Wiki:

Piven was married to her long-time collaborator Richard Cloward until his death in 2001.[2] Together with Cloward, she wrote an article in the May 1966 issue of The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty" advocating increased enrollment in social welfare programs in order to collapse that system and force reforms, leading to a guaranteed annual income.[8][9] This political strategy has been referred to as the "Cloward–Piven strategy".[10] During 2006/07 Piven served as the President of the American Sociological Association.[11]
Posted by WaveHog
Austin, TX
Member since May 2008
6968 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

Yeah I mean slavery and giving people money are basically the same thing


the impoverishment is the same thing

only one of them is worse...it's voluntary and Democrats are actively duping them into believing it's a good thing


you have got to be shitting me

you think TANF is worse than slavery?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram