re: The mass freakout over Bret Stephen's climate change article on NYT

quote:

---

I'm trying to figure out whether there's a broader principled skepticism toward science at play here, or whether it's a knee-jerk reaction toward something perceived as a liberal cause.

---

I've just given you SIX separate and distinct FACTUAL basis for questioning this scam and you think my reaction is knee-jerk?

Why is it that NO AMOUNT OF FACTS and EVIDENCE can convince you that this cult is a complete f*cking scam despite the fact that it is ABUNDANTLY CLEAR that this has been politicized by the left and the left has been engaging in MASSIVE FRAUD to perpetrate this HOAX?


Back in college I was arguing religion with a friend. She was extremely religious. What I learned is that you just don't debate religion. Religion is something that is based on faith and no amount of factual evidence can destroy or make someone question their faith.

I've come to see that Climate Change and its believers are no less persuadable -- despite the ABUNDANCE OF FACTS that would show any sane/rational person that their belief is misplaced and dependent entirely on faith, i.e., faith in those who control the data, the models, and who make their money off of this scam -- the same people who have been shown to be engaging in wide-spread fraud with the underlying data.

And, I'm sure you know the old scientific acronym -- GIGO -- Garbage In, Garbage Out.