- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Williams, Willis, Lawson, or McDowell
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:53 pm
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:53 pm
I predict we get at least one of these names tomorrow in the 2nd.
I prefer Jordan Willis because he doesn't have any character issues (Tim Williams, Malik McDowell) or injury concerns (Carl Lawson).
However, I think from a talent perspective, all are graded in the 1st round.
No matter who is called, someone will melt over the pick
I prefer Jordan Willis because he doesn't have any character issues (Tim Williams, Malik McDowell) or injury concerns (Carl Lawson).
However, I think from a talent perspective, all are graded in the 1st round.
No matter who is called, someone will melt over the pick
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:54 pm to OKtiger
We could trade the pick for Von Miller and rnmldr or whoever that is would still shite bricks and whine
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:55 pm to OKtiger
Bowser
Kid from Nova
Demarcus Walker
Derek Rivers
Trey Hendrickson
Basham
We can take two frickin rush guys if we want too
Kid from Nova
Demarcus Walker
Derek Rivers
Trey Hendrickson
Basham
We can take two frickin rush guys if we want too
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:56 pm to OKtiger
Willis would be a really nice pickup, but I'd be pleased with Lawson too. Don't really want Williams/McDowell. Also some edge guys in the third round.
And yeah I think it's safe to say rlmndr's grey matter will melt tomorrow if it hasn't already.
And yeah I think it's safe to say rlmndr's grey matter will melt tomorrow if it hasn't already.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 11:58 pm
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:56 pm to ColeLSU
A lot of saints fans are dumb. People are actually saying we should've picked Tre White over Lattimore. Another one is we should've reached on a pass rusher instead of drafting a position that we use now and will really need next year.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:57 pm to ColeLSU
quote:
We could trade the pick for Von Miller and rnmldr or whoever that is would still shite bricks and whine
There's always going to be those people. Never a good thing to be fixated on one player. Especially, one that is rated in the 60's of nearly every scout's big board
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:57 pm to OKtiger
Not williams.
A pot addicted functional retard isn't what we need.
A pot addicted functional retard isn't what we need.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:58 pm to OKtiger
Don't want Williams at ALL. He's a one down player.
Lawson scares the hell out of me with injury concerns and I don't know how he will hold in the NFL.
Will probably be gone by 42
Should've been gone by now. If he makes it to 42 it would be fantastic.
Lawson scares the hell out of me with injury concerns and I don't know how he will hold in the NFL.
quote:
Jordan Willis
Will probably be gone by 42
quote:
McDowell
Should've been gone by now. If he makes it to 42 it would be fantastic.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:59 pm to Whodatforlife21
quote:
Another one is we should've reached on a pass rusher instead of drafting a position that we use now and will really need next year.
Would you be complaining about picking a DE at 32? Would you be mad that they didn't pick an OT?
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:59 pm to Whodatforlife21
Only LSU homers would take White over Lattimore
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:00 am to OKtiger
quote:
There's always going to be those people. Never a good thing to be fixated on one player. Especially, one that is rated in the 60's of nearly every scout's big board
McDowell is my personal fav but I would've liked Willis at 32 as well.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:01 am to rmnldr
Your
quote:infatuation with
rmnldr
quote:is unsettling
McDowell
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:03 am to OKtiger
Williams/Lawson
Willis
McDowell= dead last.
please God
Willis
McDowell= dead last.
please God
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:04 am to rmnldr
I won't be mad, but we knew they were gonna draft a tackle in the draft, and getting the best one at 32 is a steal to me.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:06 am to LooseCannon22282
Unless McDowell can lose 50lbs and play Olb, why would we continue to hoard interior d linemen when we need pretty much everything else?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:13 am to Vacherie Saint
I don't think that McDowell fits our needs. I see him inside as a DT.
We have Rankins, Fairley, Davison and Onyemata.
We have Rankins, Fairley, Davison and Onyemata.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:14 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
why would we continue to hoard interior d linemen when we need pretty much everything else?
to balance out our hoarding of OL
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:15 am to chRxis
Heh? We have zero depth on the o line.
Unless you consider senio kelemente playing 5 positions "depth".
Unless you consider senio kelemente playing 5 positions "depth".
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 12:16 am
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:45 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
We have zero depth on the o line.
and this pick does nothing to help with "depth"... this guy is being drafted for 1 reason and 1 reason only... to replace Strief, which does need to be done at some point, but i don't think that it needs to be done THIS year... unless you are already a contender, you don't use your 1st round pick for "depth"...
Strief is coming off a season where he only gave up 3 sacks in 659 passing snaps... so naturally we want to draft a guy to replace one of our more solid positions, while our nonexistent pass rush is neglected....
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:48 am to chRxis
At least we got the boring pick out of the way. So we don't have to worry about it in next years draft 
Back to top

11







