- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The judge is back on fox, stands by his sources
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:47 am
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:47 am
...haha Shepard Smith. Glad he didn't back down.
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:52 am to TOPAL
That should tell you something
Where there is smoke, there is fire
Where there is smoke, there is fire
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:53 am to League Champs
quote:
Where there is smoke, there is fire
O RLY?
-Democrats regarding Russia
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:54 am to TOPAL
I recall he was "taken off the air" based on threads on the TD. But I forget the issue - anyone care to give a one-sentence description to revive my memory cell.
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:56 am to TOPAL
Shep owes The Judge an apology!
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:56 am to Pettifogger
quote:
O RLY?
-Democrats regarding Russia
Then why aren't they up in arms about Clinton's deals with China, Russia, hell Haiti
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:56 am to TOPAL
We love Judge Andrew Napolitano
Posted on 3/29/17 at 8:59 am to IceTiger
quote:
Then why aren't they up in arms about Clinton's deals with China, Russia, hell Haiti
Probably because she's largely irrelevant
Anyway, I'm rejecting the idea that smoke=fire.
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:00 am to ChineseBandit58
Obama administration "monitored " Trump before and after election, used other nations IC so the trail wouldn't come back to BO.
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:02 am to Pettifogger
quote:
O RLY?
-Democrats regarding Russia
You mean including involvement from trump? Where's the smoke? Besides.... muh Russians.
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:02 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Probably because she's largely irrelevant
Anyway, I'm rejecting the idea that smoke=fire.
Point taken
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:07 am to TOPAL
quote:Yeah, it just seems so far-fetched from an Obama risk-benefit stance.
The judge is back on fox, stands by his sources
...haha Shepard Smith. Glad he didn't back down.
But as I've said repeatedly, neither the US nor the UK have actually denied Napolitano's assertion. Instead they both created strawman denials.
So who knows.
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:07 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
You mean including involvement from trump? Where's the smoke? Besides.... muh Russians.
It's smoke. Smoke usually doesn't involve ties to the principal. That's why it's smoke, not fire.
Smoke = Multiple, odd hires with very questionable ties to Russia, overly obsequious toward Putin, responding to questions about Russia's human rights record with flustered "well we're worse!" responses, receiving some level of benefit from WikiLeaks.
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:14 am to Pettifogger
I think the indifference toward Russian awfulness is actually evidence against any ties to Russia. That obviously hurt him in the campaign, and in this hypothetical, he would be useless to Russia if he loses.
Side note: I'm almost always on mobile, your avi is hilarious
Side note: I'm almost always on mobile, your avi is hilarious
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:14 am to TOPAL
Anyone who tho nd a judge and man of his character and life achievements, would go on the highest rated cable program in history, and fabricate a story that had no truth....well, that person or those people would be some of the most ignorant, moronic people on Earth.
To think there was zero truth in his words is laughable. Now he's back and doubling down...that should tell you all you need to know. FOX is satisfied of its validity by putting him back on and letting him comment.
Now to the dissenters. Is it possible some of his info is bad? Sure it is. But to fool yourself and believe there is no truth...well, you know
To think there was zero truth in his words is laughable. Now he's back and doubling down...that should tell you all you need to know. FOX is satisfied of its validity by putting him back on and letting him comment.
Now to the dissenters. Is it possible some of his info is bad? Sure it is. But to fool yourself and believe there is no truth...well, you know
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:20 am to TOPAL
quote:What does Shepard Smith have to do with it? If you're referring to the statement that "Fox News hasn't verified the story," that was the same exact thing that Bill Hemmer was saying on American Newsroom the program before Shep.
...haha Shepard Smith.
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:22 am to the LSUSaint
quote:Even if the story is false, I don't think he fabricated it. However, because he's not a journalist, he is given leeway on what he can discuss, without requiring verification. So even it true, he wouldn't have been allowed to report it without verification if he was a typical journalist.
Anyone who tho nd a judge and man of his character and life achievements, would go on the highest rated cable program in history, and fabricate a story that had no truth
Posted on 3/29/17 at 9:24 am to buckeye_vol
Because he is an ole miss grad and his attitude sucks.
This post was edited on 3/29/17 at 9:24 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News