- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Challenges Hawaii's Judge: Hawaii Judge rejects Trump Admin request
Posted on 3/19/17 at 9:51 pm to buckeye_vol
Posted on 3/19/17 at 9:51 pm to buckeye_vol
She doesn't know. Just regurgitating blogs as usual.
94-0 speaks for itself
94-0 speaks for itself
2
Posted on 3/19/17 at 9:53 pm to udtiger
Go read the second link in the OP. When Trump countered with a challenge he offered to take the MILs country OFF the list for Hawaii; and the Judge still told POTUS to pound sand.
Posted on 3/19/17 at 9:54 pm to cajunangelle
So is Trump ok with terrirsit attacks in Hawaii?
I thought this was a matter of grave National Security? Now you're telling me Trump is negotiating our national security?
I thought this was a matter of grave National Security? Now you're telling me Trump is negotiating our national security?
Posted on 3/19/17 at 9:55 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
I don't know what else matters.
Being a Harvard grad, partnering in a law firm, trying various labor related cases.
Being a Hawaii native and all.
What would stand out as an awe-inspiring, set me above all else trait?
That would outweigh his allegiance to his appointer.
I'm not judging or questioning his legal background, far from other than just my general knowledge admittedly.
Posted on 3/19/17 at 9:58 pm to cajunangelle
No pissant judge should wield this power. Congress needs to revise district court jurisdiction.
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:03 pm to boosiebadazz
Hush it with your trifling, snide blog and know-it-all crap. There is no denying that this is overall-- Obama V. Trump and it's very politically charged. There were many articles that Obama lawyered up the courts and prepped to bring down Trump. The very articles reporting Obama's work on the side- were a comfort to the democratic butthurt, sore loser left.
Just because one of Obama's judges was approved- means nothing. Obama had all of his nominations and cabinet approved because that was back when calling people a racist, bigot worked. I am sure he is a good, intelligent judge but this is indeed politically charged.
Just because one of Obama's judges was approved- means nothing. Obama had all of his nominations and cabinet approved because that was back when calling people a racist, bigot worked. I am sure he is a good, intelligent judge but this is indeed politically charged.
This post was edited on 3/19/17 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:05 pm to kcon70
quote:He was obviously a Harvard grad (undergrad and law), and I don't know what sort of cases he worked on, but he was a partner in a law firm, and a federal prosecutor in California and Hawaii.
Being a Harvard grad, partnering in a law firm, trying various labor related cases.
He was also a Captain in the army reserve (if that matters).
quote:I just don't see anything controversial about his nomination, especially since the Senate confirmed him 94-0. Not to mention, he does have a connection to he position, which despite being in a tourist hotspot, it is a unique and far place that his knowledge (as a prosecutor and living there) doesn't seem irrelevant.
I'm not judging or questioning his legal background, far from other than just my general knowledge admittedly.
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:06 pm to cajunangelle
Right, because Obama clearly saw Trump winning the presidency in 2013 when he nominated the guy 
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:08 pm to boosiebadazz
If it indeed happened like the article stated...It appears as if Trumps lawyers were smart in this counter, as it crushes their case and standing and will look real political when it hits SCOTUS because it is. The MIL would still be vetted if I understood the vetting correctly.
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:10 pm to cajunangelle
MIL is from Syria, right? So is Syria dangerous or not? If the vetting process stringent enough or not?
You keep telling me how important the ban is, but then Trump keeps giving up pieces of it. I'm so confused.
You keep telling me how important the ban is, but then Trump keeps giving up pieces of it. I'm so confused.
This post was edited on 3/19/17 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:10 pm to OTIS2
quote:
No pissant judge should wield this power. Congress needs to revise district court jurisdiction.
Agreed. You are my fav. lawyer. Go to the adult political board and read the stickied thread.
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:10 pm to boosiebadazz
I bet you are so damned confused. Stay that way.
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:11 pm to cajunangelle
Confused why Trump doesn't care about our national security. One pissant judge disagrees with him, and now we're opening the doors for ISIS.
What the frick, man?
What the frick, man?
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:15 pm to cajunangelle
quote:Then wouldn't that have weakened have EO, if one person's challenge was enough to alter it? Besides would a court whose actually making a ruling later on, look at that and change their mind?
It appears as if Trumps lawyers were smart in this counter, as it crushes their case and standing and will look real political when it hits SCOTUS because it is.
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:20 pm to buckeye_vol
Will someone explain how the president does not get to set the cap on the number refugees? If he doesn't , then who does and what is it?
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:22 pm to THDAY
quote:He does. But that's not the issue that has been ruled on.
Will someone explain how the president does not get to set the cap on the number refugees?
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:23 pm to ChexMix
quote:
It will take the nuclear option
That needs to be saved for Ginsberg's replacement.
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:24 pm to buckeye_vol
The President apparently only gets to decide things when he is an ISIS-loving Democrat.
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:38 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Hawaii?
Frick Hawaii
Let it burn
Posted on 3/19/17 at 10:41 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Well that's an even more pointless endeavor.
Like reading your posts?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News