Started By
Message

re: Is it super dumb to finance a vehicle for 72 months?

Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:16 am to
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50382 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:16 am to
quote:

A few of my friends went that route and you just get instantly upside down.


So? Why would you want to have cash tied up in a depreciating asset, especially if you have a low or no interest rate?
Posted by rmc
Truth or Consequences
Member since Sep 2004
26598 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:19 am to
quote:

So? Why would you want to have cash tied up in a depreciating asset, especially if you have a low or no interest rate?


That's kind of what I was thinking. At 0% there is very little reason I can think of to not do 72 months. At 3.25% there is only slightly more little reason I can think of.
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
4425 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:

So? Why would you want to have cash tied up in a depreciating asset, especially if you have a low or no interest rate?


I don't disagree with you but most people wouldn't be smart enough to take the extra money and invest it. Most are just going to blow it and be screwed when they need a new vehicle.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Why would you want to have cash tied up in a depreciating asset


Doesn't matter whether it depreciates. What matters is the interest rate. So long as the rate is less than 2% (the long-term rate of inflation), stretch that baby out as long as you can.

The only way depreciation matters is if you total the car when it is less valuable than the loan balance.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram