quote:
My point that you made appoint to say that you saw it today and we're taken aback by the well pacing.

Now you are saying that you saw it before. That implies that you are interjecting pre made conclusions into your observations.

Which begs the question of how much you do that.

Now you are meationing a string of scenes you liked in a thread of conversation about pacing. Hmm.

uhhh

let me break it down for you.

1. I've seen X2 in the past.
2. I haven't seen it a while.
3. I watched some scenes when it was on this weekend
4. I forgot how well-paced it was (see #2)

eta: I may have worded the pacing comment poorly, but i think it was pretty clear from the "X2 is still my favorite" that i had seen it before

eta2: jeff asked "Better than X2?" because he and I have argued over the quality of X2 in the past

This post was edited on 3/5/17 at 11:58 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Volvagia

Fort Worth

Member since Mar 2006

51943 posts

Posted on 3/6/17 at 12:02 am to Carson123987

Uhhhh, you still missing my point.

It's literally impossible for you to be reminded by how well a movie is paced by watching a few scenes.

Ergo, you are bringing up a past conclusion, and telling yourself you saw it today.

Ergo, inherent logical fallacy.

Ergo, questionable thought process/perspective on movies in question.

Ergo, stop talking about X2 in an Logan thread.

Come on man, I like it too, but it's not amazing. Highlight of the film really is the defense of the school. Everything else is not any better than the rest of the original trilogy, even the third. Especially on the issue of "pacing."

1 ...

Report Post

Movie/TV Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board