- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If they do this to our food, and they do this to our water
Posted on 12/4/16 at 4:07 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Posted on 12/4/16 at 4:07 pm to Sleeping Tiger
are the down voters working for Dow Chemical?
Posted on 12/4/16 at 4:08 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
So tell me what they're doing to the water in pic #2
I'm glad someone else asked this, I didn't want to be the mean one to have to break it to him.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 4:10 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:Not only is what Roger wrote NOT misleading, it's accurate. If you don't agree, explain what is not accurate about his post.
What you provided was misleading.
quote:Such as?
It's selective on multiple levels.
quote:It didn't take you long to start making personal attacks against a poster who replied to your post. That has always been your standard operating procedure ever since you showed up as Mograyback and on through your other alters.
You're a joke. No interest in discussion with a manipulative little twat like you
quote:You get shite on because of your lack of information and ability to explain your thoughts without resorting to ad hominems.
The jokers who will validate you and shite on me don't mean anything.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 4:16 pm to LSURussian
quote:
You get shite on because of your lack of information and ability to explain your thoughts without resorting to ad hominems.
It's what happens when people who know a little about a lot think they are a master of all and routinely bite off more than they can chew by getting into in-depth discussions on specific topics about which the others in the discussion know more about.
He can make generalizations and rattle off gross concepts but can't delve deeper. It's a common theme among conspiracy theorists, they're just smart and worldly enough to sound intelligent in a superficial level.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 4:31 pm to CelticDog
quote:
are the down voters working for Dow Chemical?
Is Dow Chemical bad?
Posted on 12/4/16 at 4:31 pm to Roger Klarvin
I agree, Roger.
I don't know if you remember when Sleeping Tiger first started posting on TigeDroppings as Mograyback.
When he was continually laughed at he created a new screen name which I don't recall now. He got laughed off the board again and may even have been banned but then he came back with his latest screen name a couple of years ago. ETA: i just remembered his other alter, "hipgnosis." Look up his threads he started under that screen name. He is unhinged.
One of his conspiracy theories was the shooting at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Connecticut was staged and never actually happened and claims no children were hurt or killed there.
I don't know if you remember when Sleeping Tiger first started posting on TigeDroppings as Mograyback.
When he was continually laughed at he created a new screen name which I don't recall now. He got laughed off the board again and may even have been banned but then he came back with his latest screen name a couple of years ago. ETA: i just remembered his other alter, "hipgnosis." Look up his threads he started under that screen name. He is unhinged.
One of his conspiracy theories was the shooting at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Connecticut was staged and never actually happened and claims no children were hurt or killed there.
This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 10:32 pm
Posted on 12/4/16 at 6:27 pm to LSURussian
quote:With all this sick child "abuse" that's come out recently, I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Sandy Hook was part of that; with children being kidnapped and never heard from again while we're told they were killed.
One of his conspiracy theories was the shooting at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Connecticut was staged and never actually happened and claims no children were hurt or killed there.
Just because someone doesn't follow you in swallowing everything you're told to believe as truth by your government and the mainstream media, doesn't necessarily mean they are wrong.
This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 12/4/16 at 6:29 pm to LSURussian
quote:
One of his conspiracy theories was the shooting at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Connecticut was staged and never actually happened and claims no children were hurt or killed there.
I bet you also believe that everyone died on United 93 too, huh?
Posted on 12/4/16 at 6:31 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:You believe they lived?
One of his conspiracy theories was the shooting at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Connecticut was staged and never actually happened and claims no children were hurt or killed there.
I bet you also believe that everyone died on United 93 too, huh?
Posted on 12/4/16 at 6:32 pm to zatetic
Have you seen the Hawaii link to the pedophiles?? I think they are onto something
Posted on 12/4/16 at 6:34 pm to Sleeping Tiger
What do they do to our food and water? Who is they?
Posted on 12/4/16 at 6:35 pm to Sleeping Tiger
You can always grow your own food, and drink river water.
Quit trying to legislate your psychosis on the rest of us. . .
Quit trying to legislate your psychosis on the rest of us. . .
Posted on 12/4/16 at 6:42 pm to berrycajun
Here's a link to the Hawaii non profit pedo ring stuff. Tin foilers should check it out. Here's the thing. There's soooooo many connections being made and sooooo many odd deaths and suicides to those investigating pedo or trafficking that at least some of it has to be true. There are children being raped by the elites and we have a chance to take them down. The fake news agenda is trying to shut it down. Obama is trying to pass a new bill to sensor any "Russian propaganda" content attempting to persuade the people. We can't let this continue. People need to stop arguing over 9/11 and sandy hook. This pedophilia ring is current and happening now and involves children.
Hawaii thread
LINK
Hawaii thread
LINK
This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 12/4/16 at 7:42 pm to TX Tiger
So you admit your delusions are caused by you being abused as a child?
Get help.
Get help.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 7:51 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
deny that external factors influence someone getting cancer is beyond pathetic.
He didn't deny this! He actually said that external factors cause cancer and he listed some of them.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:10 pm to MrCarton
quote:
He didn't deny this!
The debate on page one was over external factors causing an increase in cancer or not.
Rodgers first contribution was focused on sharing that cancer rates are going up because we're living longer, and the elderly are the ones getting more of the cancer.
The last part of my reply to him, which said "to deny external factors.." was nothing more than a reminder that that's what was being debated on the previous page.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:13 pm to zatetic
quote:
Yeah. It's a good message. If you don't grow your own food and have filters for your water you need to be detoxing fairly often. Chelating them heavy metals too.
Good reminder for everyone Sleeping Tiger.
I think we just found sleeping tiger's alter (aka Mograyback).
Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:13 pm to Dale51
quote:
Is Dow Chemical bad?
if the only down votes are from people with a vested interest, its very interesting.
like WV voting against a candidate who promised to increase our use of solar and wind.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:19 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Roger Klarvin
This is why the age argument doesn't mean a whole lot.
What are people eating, drinking, applying to their bodies, and doing on their way to old age?
When does your timeline start? If we start the timeline when cancer became a thing (yes, its arguably been around forever in a minor way), but if we start the timeline when it became prevalent, then what good are the stats?
What kinds of cancers are increasing in younger populations, and are those the kinds of cancers that would be influenced more by external environment?
Like what Patterson Hood said in a DBT song, "seems everyone I know is getting cancer every year".
Cancer is on the rise, it's in everyones life in some way or another. It's way more of a thing now than ever and it's not just because people are getting old -- and even if that is a large part of it, what value is there in that fact, really?
The way you people go about things on here is gross. It's not a platform for discussion, it's a place to shite on people and validate yourself and feed your ego.
This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 12/4/16 at 8:21 pm to Sleeping Tiger
And to answer what the intention of this thread was..
Check the first reply.
Zero interest in a cancer debate with a bunch of babies who suck the mainstream teat.
Check the first reply.
Zero interest in a cancer debate with a bunch of babies who suck the mainstream teat.
This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 8:24 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News