- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cowboys better with Romo?
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:34 pm
How do cowboys fans feel about it? I haven't watched a ton of Cowboys football, but understand Dak has been doing pretty good. I can't help but asume that Romo would make their offense even better.
Am I completely off?
Am I completely off?
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:35 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
Probably, but you don't mess with a good thing.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:35 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
Penalties are the difference in this game.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:35 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Probably, but you don't mess with a good thing.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:35 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
Romo is better but don't tell delusional Dallas fans.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:35 pm to Roger Klarvin
Yes but populism clouds sound judgement
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:36 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Probably, but you don't mess with a good thing.
Are you a Cowboys fan??
If what you are saying is true then a stumble or two would likely cause them to consider inserting Romo back in the game wouldn't it?
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:37 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
Romo would give them a better chance to win Super Bowl but replacing a QB who has only lost 1 game is just a bad move.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:37 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Probably, but you don't mess with a good thing.
This, essentially.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:37 pm to gobuxgo5
And I'll clarify.....
The Romo we saw two years ago is better than this Dak. Can't be sure exactly what Romo we'd get this season, at 36 years old and coming off two injured season.
The Romo we saw two years ago is better than this Dak. Can't be sure exactly what Romo we'd get this season, at 36 years old and coming off two injured season.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:38 pm to apfour21
quote:
Romo would give them a better chance to win Super Bowl but replacing a QB who has only lost 1 game is just a bad move.
Such a bad move that you risk not winning the SB because of it? Don't get that logic.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:38 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
Romo would get hurt on the first series in
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:39 pm to TH03
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:41 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
Am I completely off?
Yes
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:42 pm to Roger Klarvin
Good Thing???
you are fricking losing to the Vikings 9-7.
you are fricking losing to the Vikings 9-7.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:42 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
shite, I'm a Steelers fan. Don't frick this up by putting Romo in. Dak has done well.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:43 pm to UnoMe
They're 10-1, bruh. And still can win this game.
Come on, now.
Come on, now.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:44 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:stopped here.
I haven't watched a ton of Cowboys football
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)