Started By
Message
locked post

A question for all-do you think LSU can do better than Orgeron?

Posted on 10/28/16 at 4:33 pm
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71121 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 4:33 pm
Simple question. For those against and for O being hired as HC.

Do you think LSU could do better?

Posted by CRAZY 4 LSU
Member since Apr 2006
16903 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 4:34 pm to
Easily
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28691 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 4:38 pm to
Absolutely. And hell, maybe O turns out to be a home run hire.

But the fact is that we should be able to find someone with a better track record. LSU does not have to make a risky hire, which is precisely what O is.
Posted by Royal Tiger Fan
Cali
Member since Dec 2008
1162 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 4:42 pm to
Here in lies the problem:

If LSU publicly pursues Herman, Fisher, or Kelly and all of them turns them down, then the brand takes a hit similarly to what Texas took when they thought they could get anyone in American (including Saban). The media will have a field day with that. We've seen this happen to a lot of big school over the past couple of years. USC, FLA, ND all thought they could real in bigger names than they got.

If LSU don't make the offers public, then they save face somewhat but will take a internal hit from the members of the fan base who assumes LSU can get who they want and but they didn't pursue the big names and emotionally settled for O.

I think at this point the powers to be know who they can really get and is waiting for the season to play out some more before making a move. If O is named before the season ends, then I think LSU Admin was already informed they couldn't get their top targets.

Posted by Stephen1979
Member since Oct 2016
5754 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 4:49 pm to
I don't get the sense that anyone is against O just because. I think LSU can do better and I think we could do a lot worse. I think the strong "anti O" sentiment is primarily in response to this knee jerk view of many that says let's hire him bc he has the team looking good now. He will get the opportunity to be a legitimate candidate, but I don't think you make that decision right now. To be PC, of course Alleva and the others have to say he is a candidate and support him. They can't say otherwise. I don't understand why so many on here are freaking out and taking that to mean he's the top choice
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
280926 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 4:51 pm to
better coach? yea, probably.


better fit? yes, but that list is much shorter
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42832 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 5:27 pm to
The real question is outside of Herman, is there a real, better option?
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11474 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 5:27 pm to
Yes. Aranda would be better for starters.
Posted by SmellslikeKevinBacon
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2012
6188 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 5:46 pm to
Pretty sure Aranda would be a better choice to promote to HC, rather than Coach O.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
40761 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 10:42 pm to
Uh...yeah.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28613 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:21 pm to
One question, did Ole Miss do better?

Why would I want LSU to do less than Ole Miss?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram