- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clayton Kershaw 4-6 with a 4.39 ERA In The Playoffs For His Career
Posted on 10/22/16 at 10:34 pm to dabigfella
Posted on 10/22/16 at 10:34 pm to dabigfella
84 innings is a small sample size. His postseason peripherals are pretty damn strong. This narrative is stupid.
4
Posted on 10/22/16 at 10:44 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
84 innings is a small sample size. His postseason peripherals are pretty damn strong. This narrative is stupid.
If he won more the sample size would be bigger.....but playoff sample size is always gonna be small.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:25 am to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
84 innings is a small sample size. His postseason peripherals are pretty damn strong. This narrative is stupid.
All true.
You will convince no one that pumps the narrative though.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 7:07 am to Vicks Kennel Club
He is at 89 innings and 18 games, that's half a season. No longer a small sample size for me.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 10:44 am to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
84 innings is a small sample size. His postseason peripherals are pretty damn strong. This narrative is stupid.
And what would be the narrative if he was Bumgarner-esque in the playoffs?
It would be blown up, he would be crowned more so than he already is
84 innings is not a small sample size relative to postseason IP
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News