Started By
Message

re: Statistical comparison: First 5 NFL seasons of Peyton Manning and Cam Newton

Posted on 8/12/16 at 1:15 pm to
Posted by VolInBavaria
Chattanooga, TN
Member since Dec 2015
4026 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 1:15 pm to
Manning 2, Cam 0. Only fact that is relevant
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Manning 2, Cam 0. Only fact that is relevant


Yup. But luckily Cam's career is just beginning. Manning had a 13 year head start so there's still time to make up ground, and looking at the stats Cam is setting himself up for success at a slightly faster rate.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111136 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Manning 2, Cam 0. Only fact that is relevant
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83571 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Manning 2, Cam 0. Only fact that is relevant

Well that just isn't true
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32022 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Manning 2, Cam 0. Only fact that is relevant



dumbest argument ever. Cam is an amazing qb, he does some things on the field that a qb shouldnt be able to do. Comparing stats at this point doesnt matter, its about career. If cam can keep this up another 10 years he will be an all time great. Superbowls does not determine how good a player is. If cam can keep this pace up, and never win a superbowl he will be a great.
Posted by AlabamaAlum07
Member since Jun 2014
2027 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Manning 2, Cam 0. Only fact that is relevant

So that means McCarron was a better college QB than Peyton?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram