- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ky. clerk jailed for refusing to issue marriage licenses to gay couples
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:25 pm to Acadien
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:25 pm to Acadien
You must not hear a lot liberals speak about Christians. Liberals preach Tolerance but only if you believe what liberals believe. Some even wish south had become a separate country as they feel it's stopping us from being more like Europe. They, especially Hollywood, are also a little more scared to criticize Islam or treat Mohammed like they do Jesus.
The same Supreme Court making up rights to marriage and growing federal power made up applying 1st (the one that starts with Congress...) and 2nd amendment to the States allowing Fed to enforce what were limitations on federal power onto the states. I disagree with that as well and think our country was set up to let the states being able to legislate about and/or regulate religion and guns.
I would love to Let California outlaw Christianity and guns and see how that works out for them, but only if all states can go back to original intent of 1st and 2nd being a limitation on federal govt only.
Govt not regulating lifestyles should include religious lifestyle choices and any person, private business, private school, and church should never be forced to go against religious beliefs under penalty of law like in Oregan as long as 1st amendment is applied to both federal and state.
The same Supreme Court making up rights to marriage and growing federal power made up applying 1st (the one that starts with Congress...) and 2nd amendment to the States allowing Fed to enforce what were limitations on federal power onto the states. I disagree with that as well and think our country was set up to let the states being able to legislate about and/or regulate religion and guns.
I would love to Let California outlaw Christianity and guns and see how that works out for them, but only if all states can go back to original intent of 1st and 2nd being a limitation on federal govt only.
Govt not regulating lifestyles should include religious lifestyle choices and any person, private business, private school, and church should never be forced to go against religious beliefs under penalty of law like in Oregan as long as 1st amendment is applied to both federal and state.
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:27 pm to dallastigers
quote:
You must not hear a lot liberals speak about Christians.
How often are they denying them goods and/or services?
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:28 pm to dallastigers
quote:
dallastigers
Thank you for your very stupid post. Now please go back to lurking and continuing to average less than one post per month.
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:31 pm to dallastigers
quote:
You must not hear a lot liberals speak about Christians. Liberals preach Tolerance but only if you believe what liberals believe.
Sweeping generalization game strong
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:44 pm to dallastigers
quote:
Liberals preach Tolerance but only if you believe what liberals believe
this is true...the liberals can try and deny it but they are all about wanting tolerance for things they believe in but want to ban things they are opposed to...and when a conservative opposes them they are intolerant and ignorant. Quite hypocritical if you ask me.
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:44 pm to dallastigers
quote:
dallastigers
i pray that Jesus will free your heart from all of the hate and torment trapped inside.
Posted on 9/4/15 at 6:01 pm to dallastigers
quote:
and any person, private business, private school, and church should never be forced to go against religious beliefs under penalty of law
So you would advocate for theocracy? Throughout history that has not worked out well, and is creating some serious problems in the middle east right now. Civil law HAS TO supersede an individual's interpretation of his/her religious beliefs when it comes to execution of their government jobs, if he/she needs to take a stand, then the simple solution is to step aside. Simple as that. I for one do not wish to see theocratic rule in this country.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News