Started By
Message

re: CVS stops selling cigs... sales of other stuff tumbles

Posted on 8/4/15 at 5:16 pm to
Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11445 posts
Posted on 8/4/15 at 5:16 pm to
No business EVER does something to be a good example--especially one that is publically traded and owned by shareholders...it's all about profits.They thought that this move would cause many people to move to them on the principle, and banked on more script fills, but someone forgot to really analyze the other negatives that not selling tobacco would have.

This post was edited on 8/4/15 at 5:17 pm
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
11041 posts
Posted on 8/4/15 at 5:18 pm to
what's weird is most CVS's look like a 1970's piggly wiggly. It's where you'd picture someone going to specially buy smokes.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28725 posts
Posted on 8/4/15 at 5:19 pm to
Foolish move.

When you have the second-best locations already, you shouldn't be doing anything that cuts customer traffic. The CEO should be terminated.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
8079 posts
Posted on 8/4/15 at 5:20 pm to
Not to mention that where there is a CVS a Walgreen's or Rite Aid is only a stones throw away. If the retail space was designed for the product and not selling it merely eliminates ones chance at that sale plus any "impulse purchases" that increase atv, then someone needs to lose their job. I'm guessing Rite Aid and Walgreen's flat lined over last year?

2nd Quarter Earnings
Walgreen's: 18.5% increase vs same quarter ly
Rite Aid: 4.5% increase vs same quarter ly
CVS: 2% increase vs same quarter ly
This post was edited on 8/4/15 at 5:25 pm
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37280 posts
Posted on 8/4/15 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

No business EVER does something to be a good example--especially one that is publically traded and owned by shareholders...it's all about profits.They thought that this move would cause many people to move to them on the principle, and banked on more script fills, but someone forgot to really analyze the other negatives that not selling tobacco would have.


They didn't quit selling cigarettes for any other reason then they had to. There's a law that goes into affect shortly that bans the sale of cigarettes at pharmacies.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
120023 posts
Posted on 8/4/15 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

No business EVER does something to be a good example--especially one that is publically traded and owned by shareholders...it's all about profits.They thought that this move would cause many people to move to them on the principle, and banked on more script fills, but someone forgot to really analyze the other negatives that not selling tobacco would have.


All of this.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram