- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lesbian couple preggo pic goes viral. SJWs unite in applause
Posted on 4/23/15 at 9:23 am to TigerHam85
Posted on 4/23/15 at 9:23 am to TigerHam85
quote:
Nobody expects you to see a problem. You're an Alabama fan. You fail to see the the problem with banging your own siblings.
No one here except you was thinking about incest.
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:16 am to Cosmo
Personally, I only have one real issue with this:
Why not adopt a child? Why create a life that otherwise wouldn't exist?
I believe that no matter what, these kids, no matter how much love the parents show or how good they are as parents, these kids will suffer some things that other children don't. They will inevitably feel different at some point in their lives. A child needs influence from a father in their lives and these two can't give them that.
So rather than intentionally create a life from thin air, why not adopt one, give a child already born a chance at a better life?
Why not adopt a child? Why create a life that otherwise wouldn't exist?
I believe that no matter what, these kids, no matter how much love the parents show or how good they are as parents, these kids will suffer some things that other children don't. They will inevitably feel different at some point in their lives. A child needs influence from a father in their lives and these two can't give them that.
So rather than intentionally create a life from thin air, why not adopt one, give a child already born a chance at a better life?
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:22 am to loopback
quote:
Why create a life that otherwise wouldn't exist?
It's actually one of their biological children.
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:27 am to Mung
But in nature, 2 females or two males can't make a new life
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:30 am to Mung
quote:
It's actually one of their biological children.
Correct but biologically impossible with her current "partner"
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:31 am to Cosmo
those poor kids are going to be 10 kinds of fricked up after growing up with 2 sjw lesbo moms
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:34 am to loopback
quote:
Personally, I only have one real issue with this:
My only issue is a child needs a father growing up. I'm sure (or at least I hope) they will give their kids a stable and loving home. But it will still be an incomplete home in that there's no father there for these kids.
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:43 am to loopback
quote:
Why not adopt a child? Why create a life that otherwise wouldn't exist?
It is excedingly difficult for gay people to adopt domestically, in large part due to the fact that many orphanages and adoption agencies are run by the Catholic Church and other fundamentally conservative groups.
There are millions of people in this country who would rather a child have no parents than gay parents.
This post was edited on 4/23/15 at 10:44 am
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:52 am to loopback
This applies to every child of divorced parents, as well, but if someone expresses that, people basically tell them to get over it and label them as a bitch.
I was the only child to divorced parents until I was almost 19 years old. My dad lived hours away, and he wasn't around for the majority of the events in my life. He made it to the major benchmarks and spent time here and there with me, but I feel like I missed out on a lot by not having him around to teach me things and impart his knowledge unto me. Most of my friends have excellent relationships with their fathers, and the experiences they had growing up seem almost unreal to me.
This may seem like it supports your point, but my point is actually in the contrary. I ended up developing my interests, hobbies, and how to do things on my own instead of having a father who would have me do and like the things that he did. I developed my love of sports, especially soccer, on my own. I learned how to do everything from fixing things around the house to building computers on my own at a young age. I spent tons of time programming and reading things like encyclopedias to learn as much as I could. Those are things that ended up defining me as a person later in life, and luckily, they've lead to skills for a great career. My father hates soccer, wouldn't let me touch a computer when I was younger much less open one up and install a 56k modem, and thought that I was strange and wasted my time programming and reading those encyclopedias. If he were around, chances are that I'd be completely different as a person, and I wouldn't have these things that bring me joy in life. Now, he was young when I was born and wasn't a terrible father, but I'm very happy with the way things turned out regardless of this situation I was dealt.
Now, that's clearly all anecdotal and isn't something to base an argument on alone, but it brings me to my main point in all of this. I didn't miss out because I didn't have my father around. I missed out because all I had was my mother, her opinions, and what she knew, liked, and cared about. When she and I fought, I didn't have anyone to turn to, and when she was being irrational, there was no one around to take my side. I missed out because I didn't have anyone else to give me knowledge based on their life experiences, expose me to things that they loved, or be there for me when I needed someone. Once I got a little older, I was mostly alone, and that really impacted me in terms of dealing with people. It also lead to me having very big issues with feeling alone a lot of the time and not talking about issues with anyone, which is something I'm finally working to fix. Again, I didn't miss out because I didn't have a father around. I missed out because I only had a single parent around, and as hard as she tried, she still had to work and couldn't be around half as much as she'd have liked. I didn't have a bad childhood at all, but I'd be lying to say I wish I'd have had someone else around to help me develop as a human being.
I place a TON of importance on children living in a two parent household, and I decided a long time ago that my kids wouldn't go through what I went through growing up. I just don't think the genders of those parents have anything to do with the outcome of the child. I'd rather see a thousand gay couples, who actually want children, be wonderful parents than a single case of shitty arse people getting married because it's the cool thing to do, having kids to bring more people into their shitty experiment, getting divorced (or worse, staying together), and being awful parents to their children for eternity. If a child has two people who love them immensely and care for them, you can't tell me that these kids will automatically just feel different and suffer as a result.
TL;DR: Children of heterosexual parents who divorce are just as likely, if not more likely, to suffer than children of homosexual couples. We aren't banning marriages or stopping them from having kids, though.
I was the only child to divorced parents until I was almost 19 years old. My dad lived hours away, and he wasn't around for the majority of the events in my life. He made it to the major benchmarks and spent time here and there with me, but I feel like I missed out on a lot by not having him around to teach me things and impart his knowledge unto me. Most of my friends have excellent relationships with their fathers, and the experiences they had growing up seem almost unreal to me.
This may seem like it supports your point, but my point is actually in the contrary. I ended up developing my interests, hobbies, and how to do things on my own instead of having a father who would have me do and like the things that he did. I developed my love of sports, especially soccer, on my own. I learned how to do everything from fixing things around the house to building computers on my own at a young age. I spent tons of time programming and reading things like encyclopedias to learn as much as I could. Those are things that ended up defining me as a person later in life, and luckily, they've lead to skills for a great career. My father hates soccer, wouldn't let me touch a computer when I was younger much less open one up and install a 56k modem, and thought that I was strange and wasted my time programming and reading those encyclopedias. If he were around, chances are that I'd be completely different as a person, and I wouldn't have these things that bring me joy in life. Now, he was young when I was born and wasn't a terrible father, but I'm very happy with the way things turned out regardless of this situation I was dealt.
Now, that's clearly all anecdotal and isn't something to base an argument on alone, but it brings me to my main point in all of this. I didn't miss out because I didn't have my father around. I missed out because all I had was my mother, her opinions, and what she knew, liked, and cared about. When she and I fought, I didn't have anyone to turn to, and when she was being irrational, there was no one around to take my side. I missed out because I didn't have anyone else to give me knowledge based on their life experiences, expose me to things that they loved, or be there for me when I needed someone. Once I got a little older, I was mostly alone, and that really impacted me in terms of dealing with people. It also lead to me having very big issues with feeling alone a lot of the time and not talking about issues with anyone, which is something I'm finally working to fix. Again, I didn't miss out because I didn't have a father around. I missed out because I only had a single parent around, and as hard as she tried, she still had to work and couldn't be around half as much as she'd have liked. I didn't have a bad childhood at all, but I'd be lying to say I wish I'd have had someone else around to help me develop as a human being.
I place a TON of importance on children living in a two parent household, and I decided a long time ago that my kids wouldn't go through what I went through growing up. I just don't think the genders of those parents have anything to do with the outcome of the child. I'd rather see a thousand gay couples, who actually want children, be wonderful parents than a single case of shitty arse people getting married because it's the cool thing to do, having kids to bring more people into their shitty experiment, getting divorced (or worse, staying together), and being awful parents to their children for eternity. If a child has two people who love them immensely and care for them, you can't tell me that these kids will automatically just feel different and suffer as a result.
TL;DR: Children of heterosexual parents who divorce are just as likely, if not more likely, to suffer than children of homosexual couples. We aren't banning marriages or stopping them from having kids, though.
Posted on 4/23/15 at 11:17 am to Dijkstra
quote:
Children of heterosexual parents who divorce are just as likely, if not more likely, to suffer than children of homosexual couples
While your argument is valid, there is one major difference in the two.
Hetero parents who have a child, do so with no intentions of getting divorced (hoepfully) at the time of conception and divorce comes later.
Homo parents have a child KNOWING that the child will not have a "two parent" household at the time of conception.
quote:
If a child has two people who love them immensely and care for them, you can't tell me that these kids will automatically just feel different and suffer as a result.
They absolutely will, that is the way of society, imagine "doughnuts with Dad" day at elementary school.
This is besides the point, I'm not arguing that the couple can't raise a child, I'm arguing that they should do it by way of adoption, rather than create new life.
This post was edited on 4/23/15 at 11:20 am
Posted on 4/23/15 at 11:32 am to loopback
quote:
imagine "doughnuts with Dad" day at elementary school
I guess the butchier of the two gets to go?
Posted on 4/23/15 at 11:43 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
big black nemesis
parthenogenesis...
parthenogenesis...
Posted on 4/23/15 at 11:44 am to Mung
parthenogenesis
You know what he meant.
quote:
can also be found in some species of fish, amphibians, birds, and reptiles, but not in mammals.
You know what he meant.
Posted on 4/23/15 at 12:23 pm to TIGRLEE
For once I agree with you. How can anyone find 2 knocked up lesbians inspirational?
I mean good for them, that their happy, but inspirational? Come on.
It's crazy that this is inspirational and news worthy. Then you have a couple with infertility problems who struggle to get pregnant. When they finally do after years of trying, would never make the news. I'm not saying that is newsworthy either, but it's more inspirational and deserving than this.
I feel for the kid also, even if they have 2 loving parents (we dont know how they are), then he will deal with being picked on at some point over this.
I feel like people over compensate putting homosexuality in the news, making a big deal about it, because it's the cool thing to do these days. Just like society tries to make everything about race. Could you imagine if this was a african american and white lesbian couple with mixed kids? We would have to reward them and give them a nobel peace prize.
I mean good for them, that their happy, but inspirational? Come on.
It's crazy that this is inspirational and news worthy. Then you have a couple with infertility problems who struggle to get pregnant. When they finally do after years of trying, would never make the news. I'm not saying that is newsworthy either, but it's more inspirational and deserving than this.
I feel for the kid also, even if they have 2 loving parents (we dont know how they are), then he will deal with being picked on at some point over this.
I feel like people over compensate putting homosexuality in the news, making a big deal about it, because it's the cool thing to do these days. Just like society tries to make everything about race. Could you imagine if this was a african american and white lesbian couple with mixed kids? We would have to reward them and give them a nobel peace prize.
This post was edited on 4/23/15 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 4/23/15 at 2:49 pm to GRTiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/20/18 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 4/23/15 at 2:57 pm to SabiDojo
quote:I agree. We shouldn't help gays have children since they don't want to have them in a normal way. And I feel sorry for kids who have to grow up with these people
MessagePosted by SabiDojoAnd your part of the problem america shouldnt normilize this sinfull behavior youre kids will grow up confused thinking being gay is fine and cool but its not its the devils work and you will be judged we need to stop this before it gets out of control and kids become trany prostitutes when they grow up i dont wont our future generations to die of aids
Posted on 4/23/15 at 3:00 pm to Dylan
I fit that criteria. Me and my wife have tried for 8 years to have a child. Spent thousands. But yet, let's celebrate these people having one who live a sinful life
Posted on 4/23/15 at 3:13 pm to gingerkittie
quote:
Read the article.LINK
:yack: :yack: :yack:
Posted on 4/23/15 at 3:36 pm to tiger91
So each one has or will have a child?
So when times get rough will the biological father pay child support. Of course I will assume this was artificial insemination.
So when times get rough will the biological father pay child support. Of course I will assume this was artificial insemination.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News