Started By
Message

re: ACT scores are horse sh*t

Posted on 3/13/15 at 12:22 am to
Posted by mattytiger123
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2014
3022 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 12:22 am to
No, but I was a huge dumbass in highschool. fricked around and graduated with a 2.8 GPA. Got a 31 on my act. There were people so much smarter than me that got below a 25 just because they weren't good test takers.
The reason I posted about it is because my cousin has a 4.0 and is in the honors class at his highschool, but won't get many scholarships because he's got a 22 on his ACT. He's studied hard but just can't get it done. He needs a 27 to get the scholarships he needs to go to the college he wants. He's always been a bad test taker but is a lot smarter and driven than I was at his age. I just feel for him brah.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 12:23 am to
ACT scores don't mean shite when it comes to making money.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71584 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 12:25 am to
You didn't get a 31, don't lie to the group.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35243 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 12:32 am to
quote:

No, but I was a huge dumbass in highschool. fricked around and graduated with a 2.8 GPA. Got a 31 on my act. There were people so much smarter than me that got below a 25 just because they weren't good test takers. The reason I posted about it is because my cousin has a 4.0 and is in the honors class at his highschool, but won't get many scholarships because he's got a 22 on his ACT. He's studied hard but just can't get it done. He needs a 27 to get the scholarships he needs to go to the college he wants. He's always been a bad test taker but is a lot smarter and driven than I was at his age. I just feel for him brah.
Great anecdotes. They still represent the exception. Not to mention, you seem to be basing "smartness" on your own subjective evaluation, which is surely less accurate than the ACT.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98429 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 12:35 am to
quote:

No, but I was a huge dumbass in highschool. fricked around and graduated with a 2.8 GPA. Got a 31 on my act. There were people so much smarter than me that got below a 25 just because they weren't good test takers. The reason I posted about it is because my cousin has a 4.0 and is in the honors class at his highschool, but won't get many scholarships because he's got a 22 on his ACT. He's studied hard but just can't get it done. He needs a 27 to get the scholarships he needs to go to the college he wants. He's always been a bad test taker but is a lot smarter and driven than I was at his age. I just feel for him brah.


There are colleges, including some elite schools, that minimize the impact of test scores, or don't use them at all. He should do some research.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 12:55 am to
quote:

because they weren't good test takers


I am sorry but this means you are not smart, saying anything else is just an attempt to make people feel better. If you can answer a question quickly you are smart, if not you aren't that smart.
Posted by CajunAlum Tiger Fan
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Jan 2008
7882 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 12:59 am to
quote:

There were people so much smarter than me that got below a 25 just because they weren't good test takers





I love this logic. When a high school kid can study hard and make straight A's it doesn't mean he's smart, it means he can memorize.

Congrats, you are smarter than them and your cousin. . . not so much.

Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 1:15 am to
quote:

The reason I posted about it is because my cousin got a 22 on his ACT.


Isnt that borderline retard level now with the inflated act scores? That score was like a 15 when i went to college in 2000.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424482 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 8:31 am to
quote:

but won't get many scholarships because he's got a 22 on his ACT. He's studied hard but just can't get it done. He needs a 27 to get the scholarships

there is a HUGE difference in a 22 and 27

a 27 is 87th percentile

a 22 is 62nd percentile

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram