- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Legal challenge to FFP moving along
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:46 am to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:46 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
You act as if Chelsea wasn't successful right before the were bought
Hadn't won the league in 50 years, only a small handful of top 4 finishes in that time. You're really going to try to say with a straight face they would be where there are now if FFP were instituted in say, 1999?
quote:
Get your protecting the top dogs conspiracy out of here.
If that's not what it is then tell me why they didn't stop at just limiting debts? Why shouldn't owners be able to spend their own cash to improve their clubs?
quote:
lol QPR just posted a loss of only around 10 million pounds.
You said PSG and City were the only 2 clubs against FFP, I proved you wrong.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 8:52 am
2
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:54 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Hadn't won the league in 50 years, only a small handful of top 4 finishes in that time. You're really going to try to say with a straight face they would be where there are now if FFP were instituted in say, 1999?
Would they be as good, of course not. Difference they got their kick start and changed their ways. City and PSG have no intentions of doing so. City was a yoyo club that the initial cash helped. But spending over 100 million window after window is absurd. Chelsea didn't even do that.
Since the premier league started City have almost caught Chelsea in money spent on players even though Chelsea had a huge head start. The revolving door at City is bad for the league and especially for youth players who are english or anywhere else.
quote:
You said PSG and City were the only 2 clubs against FFP, I proved you wrong.
They were in the Championship at the time, like they were even relevant. Along with other Championship clubs who voted against it.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 8:57 am
Posted on 3/3/15 at 9:10 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
If that's not what it is then tell me why they didn't stop at just limiting debts? Why shouldn't owners be able to spend their own cash to improve their clubs?
Then why was Liverpool under FFP investigation for 3 years.
This supposed to keep the status quo right
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News