Started By
Message

re: The 35 most powerful militaries in the world

Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:42 pm to
Posted by MoreLandshark
Starkvegas
Member since Dec 2014
744 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:42 pm to
It doesn't say that North Korea has nuclear submarines. I'm sure most if not all of theirs are still diesel
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:42 pm to
That entire thing is just ridiculous
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78206 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

It doesn't say that North Korea has nuclear submarines. I'm sure most if not all of theirs are still diesel



My statement still stands
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

I find it really hard to believe that North Korea has 78 nuclear submarines. Hell I find it hard to believe they have 1.



I just looked and it doesn't say nuclear, just subs
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:44 pm to
Posted by siliconvalleytiger
Bay Area, CA
Member since Apr 2004
31160 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:52 pm to
I can't see shite.
This post was edited on 3/1/15 at 10:53 pm
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
66182 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:53 pm to


This simply requires no explanation.



/thread
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3170 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

South Korea - 9
North Korea - 35


Um, South Korea may have double the North's population but, other than that, the North has pretty much all other advantages in a head-to-head match-up.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

just looked and it doesn't say nuclear, just subs




That is probably the sub to steal if you only had an hour to disappear.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68774 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:01 pm to
Calling bullshite on China and US manpower.
Posted by whit
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
11000 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:03 pm to
I love how he just said "frick it" and didn't give a shite about fixing it.
Posted by pivey14
In Your Head
Member since Mar 2012
15445 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

Since when has the US had 145 million people in the military? Are you retarded or did you not even glance at the infographic?



I'm guessing it's referring to those eligible for the draft, but who knows. That number does seem astronomically high.
This post was edited on 3/1/15 at 11:06 pm
Posted by Diddles
LA
Member since Apr 2013
6981 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:05 pm to
GOAT
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35576 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:05 pm to
I can see it.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

I'm guessing it's referring to those eligible for the draft.



Even that is way off unless you count men and women of draft age
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46526 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Calling bullshite off the bat.

take your complaint up with business insider and their sources they listed on the bottom of the picture
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46526 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:10 pm to
the pic in the OP should be fixed. I rehosted it on my imgur account.

I think the pic I originally posted was could be seen by those on desktop but not mobile
This post was edited on 3/1/15 at 11:12 pm
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:13 pm to
We are spending way way too fricking much, what 5 times more than everyone else put together
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16932 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

Russia can have all those tanks lol.. stuck in 1940. Airplanes and Aircraft carriers is how the new war will be fought..


Umm, you don't know what you're talking about. Tanks are still extremely important for land warfare and particularly for the geopolitical context Russia exists in. There's a reason the US still has so many as well.

Also, the aircraft carrier faces extreme vulnerabilities in future warfare and has tremendous costs. They allow flexibility but are by no means necessary to exert regional power or even to effectively combat an enemy that does possess them.
Posted by WalkingTurtles
Alexandria
Member since Jan 2013
5913 posts
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:35 pm to
First question is why in the hell do we and the Russians have 8k nukes each, that's a bit overkill. Also the only stat that matters in today's military is aircraft and navy and we have more than all the other countries combined.

Also I would love to see all these "subs" North Korea has.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram