- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why the hate on Brick?
Posted on 1/7/15 at 3:47 pm to Magician
Posted on 1/7/15 at 3:47 pm to Magician
[quote]If you thought 3rd and Chavis was bad go look at Bricks stats as a DC at Baylor. [/quote
imo, those shouldn't count that much. how long ago was that? and Baylor never gave a shite about defense and was not the "power" they are today. Baylor got the athletes that didn't want to go to tejas, okie, okie lite, tejas tech or aggie.
imo, those shouldn't count that much. how long ago was that? and Baylor never gave a shite about defense and was not the "power" they are today. Baylor got the athletes that didn't want to go to tejas, okie, okie lite, tejas tech or aggie.
1
Posted on 1/7/15 at 3:52 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
Baylor got the athletes that didn't want to go to tejas, okie, okie lite, tejas tech or aggie.
So does TCU now . . . just sayin'.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 3:56 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
So does TCU now . . . just sayin'.
dude...
TCU is getting WAY better players than Baylor was at that time.
I don't think you realize just how far behind the game they were back then.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 3:57 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
So does TCU now . . . just sayin'
nah, TCU gets a lot better athletes than they used to. their HC, their location and Tejas U being a dumpster fire has moved them way up in the pecking order in Texas. Baylor does too it's just their HC doesn't give a shite about defense. he recruits offense players only (pretty much)
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:00 pm to BilJ
quote:
why?
For all the reasons i listed after the first sentence
quote:
cool
Very cool. Coach O would be a phenomenal addition
quote:
It was a total failure and he hasn't gotten a look as a DC since.
quote:
Miss St has had 2 chances to hire him as DC
Interesting....
quote:
very, very debatable
Mingo, Brockers, Ferguson, etc say hi
quote:
Its probably an even worse move.
why? (swidt?)
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:03 pm to tgerb8
Nothing against Brick, but if it is he who gets the nod, the contract likely won't pay what Chavis made or what Shoop would ask for (just my speculation).
Heck, Alleva didn't want to give Chavis very good buyout terms.
So, if Brick gets the nod, do you get the feeling Alleva is keeping Les on a tighter leash?
Heck, Alleva didn't want to give Chavis very good buyout terms.
So, if Brick gets the nod, do you get the feeling Alleva is keeping Les on a tighter leash?
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:09 pm to AgBank
To me if Brick gets the nod it may be similar to the Studrawa deal. LSU may be looking to hire big for the following year. Just maybe
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:11 pm to LSU Red24
He has sucked in his previous stints at DC and he isn't even a good DL coach.
LSU has been known for elite DLs for the past decade. Since he has been here the DL has gotten worse and worse. Every recruit he has personally recruited and coached all the years he was here have been huge underacheivers and busts
LSU has been known for elite DLs for the past decade. Since he has been here the DL has gotten worse and worse. Every recruit he has personally recruited and coached all the years he was here have been huge underacheivers and busts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:18 pm to LSU Red24
The fact that he entertained leaving with Chavis would be enough for most coaches to release him much less promote him to DC-
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:19 pm to LSU Red24
quote:
may be looking to hire big for the following year. Just maybe
We don't have a year to waste unless you are indicating the big hire would be for HC
This post was edited on 1/7/15 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:27 pm to LSU Red24
It's simple
LSU shouldn't have to settle for a DC
LSU shouldn't have to settle for a DC
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:29 pm to LSU Red24
Its LSU.
We should not have to promote from within for a big Coordinator job.
We should not have to promote from within for a big Coordinator job.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:32 pm to LSU Red24
quote:
Mingo,
very under developed, was drafted on his freak athletic ability. It took a season and a half for them to get him properly coached up technique wise
quote:
Ferguson
I guess I can pull the article where they said he came in with awful technique as well
Name the other 4-5 star kids that have come in recent years we can't even get on the field to just get a few reps
Posted on 1/7/15 at 4:37 pm to LSU Red24
quote:
I don't think it'd be a bad promotion at all
I think you are mistaken
quote:
It could allow for Coach O to come aboard as well
So would a real DC hire and moving Ensminger into the office. All our TE's do is block. Have Grimes coach them. If they choose to incorporate them into the passing game, give them to Henry. Ensminger is useless. He is supposedly a TE coach yet we never have any good TE's.
quote:
He's been a DC
If you are going to bring it up, bring up his level of success.
quote:
he played for and coached with Chavis
Chavis did great things, but his 2 minute D and 3rd down struggles are very real. We get little pressure and if not for a very high level of talent, his D was very bad. Look at the beginning of 2014. Young guys not ready to dominate and it couldn't stop anybody. No in game adjustments. Was crazy good against the spread though.
quote:
he develops talent well
No he doesn't. Brockers and Mingo are the outliers and he inherited them. Montgomery and Logan both declined under him. Freak, Rasco, Hunter, Allen, and now Herron, Gilmore, Bain. All of these guys were highly coveted and none have shown anywhere close to the potential they were supposed to have.
Plus on almost every major 5* recruit we assign him to, he finishes second. LSU's D finished tied for 103rd in sacks., had the 46th ranked rush Def and was 64th in TFL.
That's where he has brought DLineU.
Why the love?
Posted on 1/7/15 at 5:33 pm to Dr RC
quote:
Dr RC
Aggie fans would love it, I am sure.
It would be like Texas A&M got the superhero:
And we promoted his sidekick:
Posted on 1/7/15 at 7:39 pm to LSU Red24
quote:
I don't think it'd be a bad promotion at all.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 7:53 pm to LSU Red24
Dunno. Brick is solid. Never needs painting.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 8:00 pm to OneMoreTime
Yeah, over 15 years ago. before he coached in the NFL, the SEC. You cant judge him on that.
I KNOW Coach Haley, worked with him for a year. He's a good man and would be an excellent DC. Pair him with an incoming Coach O... you're cooking with more than fire, you're cooking with a flamethrower.
I KNOW Coach Haley, worked with him for a year. He's a good man and would be an excellent DC. Pair him with an incoming Coach O... you're cooking with more than fire, you're cooking with a flamethrower.
This post was edited on 1/7/15 at 8:03 pm
Posted on 1/7/15 at 8:08 pm to Sal Minella
quote:
But what would Kevin Mawae know
Apparently not much Mr hall of fame should worry about his own coaching career
Posted on 1/7/15 at 8:17 pm to Chase.E.Chabaud
quote:
KNOW Coach Haley, worked with him for a year. He's a good man and would be an excellent DC. Pair him with an incoming Coach O... you're cooking with more than fire, you're cooking with a flamethrower
Really? So what defense does brick generally run?
Does LSU have the athletes on scholarship for bricks scheme?
Is it similar to a chavis defense?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News