Started By
Message

This whole Chavis thing indicates

Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:33 pm
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:33 pm
To me that Miles is potentially on a short leash. What is Les' buyout after next season? After the next?

Not wanting to lock Chavis might indicate you do not want to hamstring the next coach.

No, I'm not a Miles basher. What say you?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263293 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:34 pm to
I think it indicates that for some reason, Chavis wasn't 100% comfortable attaching his future to Miles being at LSU.
Posted by DC4LSU
baton rouge
Member since Aug 2011
2262 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Miles is potentially on a short leash


THIS
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:35 pm to
I hope you didn't hurt yourself with that stretch.
Posted by Hiphopanonymous
Baton rouge
Member since Jul 2014
2399 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:36 pm to
I agree.
Posted by Duck enticer
Crowley
Member since Apr 2010
1253 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:37 pm to
Its a good point man.
Posted by houstontyga
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2004
4175 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

To me that Miles is potentially on a short leash. What is Les' buyout after next season? After the next?


Dear god let it be true
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48699 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

No, I'm not a Miles basher. What say you?


Nega Tiger Celebration Day !

Wow !

Worry not. Coach Miles has an imperative drive to bobulate to ordain the Crucible of Victory for LSU.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56332 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:41 pm to
I'm not so sure.

on Dec 11th Chavis got his new contract. It had the Miles clause.

Miles was a candidate for the Michigan job and it is likely if he was offered he would take it. Meaning that in Chavis mind on dec 11th the contract that was given to them was very risky. He wasn't willing to sign. This Miles clause moved him to be willing to leave for a division rival.

This is a guess on my part, but it has been confirmed that he didn't like the miles clause. You guys think it has to dow with Miles being on the hot seat. I think it's more logical to think it had to do with the Michigan situation and the fact that if Miles was offered he would likely go there. Chavis didn't want a contract that could be worthless within a month of Miles to Michigan ever got serious. There was a decent chance.

Again these are just guesses but they are educated guesses.
Posted by Papa Tigah
TIGER ISLAND, LA
Member since Sep 2007
18576 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 1:44 pm to
Yes
Posted by LSUANDY25
Frisco
Member since Dec 2012
3087 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:22 pm to
I could be alot of things or a combination of a few. Doubtful we'll ever know the real reason vs the politically correct answer. Id just like to know if it were LSU seeing the chance to move on from Chavis or vice versa.
I'll say this, this was a great get for Sumlin and A&M, home run both politically and real. These are the types of moves that change the landscape.
Posted by Katy Tiger
Houston area
Member since Sep 2004
8032 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:37 pm to
Les is not yet finished running the car into the ditch.
Posted by windhammontanatigers
windham-stanford, montana
Member since Nov 2009
4993 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:40 pm to
As I mentioned to another poster in another thread, I didn't think about this yesterday and the day before when the smoke began to come up from the ashes, but with looking at what is being said if it is indeed true with the tie in to Les, I believe you may be right. Ole Joe may be rethinking that huge buyout and as many have said that buyout goes down each and every year and Hanny said on his show last night that he believes the automatic 1 year rollover is out of the deal too. All that to say this Sid, I agree with your point of view.
Posted by eddieray
Lafayette
Member since Mar 2006
18031 posts
Posted on 12/31/14 at 2:41 pm to
His job will be much easier at A&M. It's got to be hard being DC here. The offense goes 3 and out so much there are no defensive wrinkles left for the second half. In addition, our offense really didn't put up many pts in the SEC. Yea, there's defensive talent here but there's no room for error on defense most weeks.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram