Started By
Message

Will the Saints cut Morstead this offseason?

Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:18 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:18 pm
He's been a great punter for us for a while now. I started this thread in the offseason and was ripped apart for it.

His contract:

2015 - $3.4 million cap hit. Save $1.25 by cutting him
2016 - $4.45 million cap hit. Save $3.25 by cutting him
2017 - $4 million cap hit.

Is it worth paying the price of a solid contributor on offense or defense for a position that can be filled for the minimum?

For comparison:

Sproles
2014 - $2 million
2015 - $4 million
2016 - $4 million

Keenan Lewis
2014 - $3.35 million
2015 - $4.85 million
2016 - $7.3 million

Easily enough for a FA guard

Posted by Gugich22
Who Dat Nation
Member since Jan 2006
27722 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:21 pm to
I don't think so. They might ask him to restructure but he's a great punter.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
167136 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:22 pm to
He sucks too
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43316 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:22 pm to
I hope not. He's a weapon.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30195 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 3:27 pm to
Issue is you save 1.25mil by cutting him, down a punter, and you need to then spend 420k on another punter that is rather unknown. You'd save only 800k, but sacrificing a solid punter for an unknown. There are better ways to make 800k. Next year is the better time to do it, not this.
This post was edited on 11/25/14 at 3:28 pm
Posted by bountyhunter
North of Houston a bit
Member since Mar 2012
6367 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Easily enough for a FA guard

If the position of need is for Guard, they'll almost certainly go after the players in those positions now for restructuring. By asking Morstead to restructure for a need on the offensive line is the age-old analogy, "Robbing Peter to pay Paul". Now, if they were going after a kicker with a longer FG range, then I would say asking Morstead to restructure wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility. Typically GMs look at salaries categorically, ie. you move money from Special Teams to pay for a need on Special teams.

The real issue is we are paying big money for sub-par play at the Guard position. Honestly they need to target a Guard in the draft and possibly grab a FA from somewhere. Also they need to get a real Oline coach. This transition for Ingalls is clearly not working out. As far as the fate of Evans and Grubbs, one of them should go and the better of the two should be kept at a reduced rate. They've looked like oversized babies on roller skates getting pushed around all season.
This post was edited on 11/25/14 at 4:07 pm
Posted by TG
Metairie
Member since Sep 2004
3064 posts
Posted on 11/25/14 at 4:49 pm to
He also kicks off
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64690 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 7:23 am to
quote:

can be filled for the minimum?


Any position can be filled for the min.
But what you get is usually the min talent.
I don't see a huge gain dollar wise in cutting him. Perhaps a restructure is in order but I don't cut him.
He's been the only bright spot on poor ST for years.
Posted by TwoDatBait
Northshore, LA
Member since Jul 2011
5832 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 10:23 am to
he is the best defensive player we got right now.......
Posted by LakeCountryRed
Training for the Kumite
Member since Feb 2013
2223 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 10:30 am to
He stays after some Loomis Magic
Posted by CaliforniaTiger
The Land of Fruits and Nuts
Member since Dec 2007
5309 posts
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:19 pm to
I hope not, I really like him!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram