Started By
Message

re: Official Ferguson Live Riot Thread - Wilson to NOT be Indicted!

Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:44 pm to
Posted by LSUfanalways
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
591 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:44 pm to
The decision not to indict was probably proper, although why not let a jury decide? The standard for an indictment is considerably lower than the standard for a guilty verdict, and jury nullification would have occurred. However I do question not if it was proper to shoot Michael Brown; it probably was. My question is why the excessive shots? The head shot, which came after, seemed excessive to me.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116972 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

The decision not to indict was probably proper, although why not let a jury decide?


A jury did decide

quote:

The standard for an indictment is considerably lower than the standard for a guilty verdict


Should tell you all you need to know

quote:

My question is why the excessive shots? The head shot, which came after, seemed excessive to me.



You don't know what you are talking about. An officer is trained that way. When you shoot, you shoot to kill.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
135222 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

The decision not to indict was probably proper, although why not let a jury decide? The standard for an indictment is considerably lower than the standard for a guilty verdict, and jury nullification would have occurred. However I do question not if it was proper to shoot Michael Brown; it probably was. My question is why the excessive shots? The head shot, which came after, seemed excessive to me.


You don't take a case to trial unless there's a chance of conviction.


Anyone who has taken any type of defensive weapons training knows that you engage the threat until it is no longer a threat. It could be 1 shot or it could be 20. He didn't stand over MB and keep pumping rounds into him.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
71106 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

The head shot, which came after, seemed excessive to me.


The head shot was because he put his head down to charge. How would that be excessive?
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
47826 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:50 pm to
Trained to empty the clip.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27876 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:52 pm to
I'd be very surprised if there isn't a federal indictment on civil rights violations. Even if not, Wilson's career and any idea of a normal life are effectively over for him and his wife. Just an ugly situation from both sides.
Posted by Jreily85
Member since Nov 2014
590 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

why the excessive shots? The head shot, which came after, seemed excessive to me.



You shoot to kill.
Posted by Gulf Coast Tiger
Ms Gulf Coast
Member since Jan 2004
18755 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

However I do question not if it was proper to shoot Michael Brown; it probably was. My question is why the excessive shots?


This is a common misconception of the public. This isn't a video game where you just shoot. You get what is called "tunnel vision" and you don't know how many shots you fire in a situation like this. It happens so fast and the adrenaline is pumping pretty hard at this point. The head shot is the one that stopped him.

Officers in this situation only have a accuracy of around 25%. On the most guys shoot 90% at a paper target and then in real life it goes down to 25%.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

My question is why the excessive shots? The head shot, which came after, seemed excessive to me.

You asked an honest question so I will build off of the response of others. Once the decision was made to use deadly force (which took less than a second) then training takes over. He would continue to engage until the target was neutralized/no longer presenting a threat. It is not about number of shots (he is not even counting them - he would have kept firing until he had an empty chamber and then would have transitioned to a reload drill) but rather intended effect. Excessive would have been if Mike Brown was on the ground, incapacitated and Officer Wilson walks up to him and shoots him again.

Sorry. Those are the facts. This is not a video game where you immediately know the effect of your fire on your target. This is real life.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram