- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bombshell: Email proves Obama/Holder targeted Sharyl Attkisson
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:28 am to bamafan1001
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:28 am to bamafan1001
quote:Lerner did
IRS targeting conservative groups...yeah that happened
quote:I don't think you know what that word means.
Fast and Furious coverup...yeah that happened
Benghazi coverup...yeah that happened
quote:So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
Lies about ACA to get it passed...yeah that happened
quote:The US govt can't track / prosecute leaks?
Fox News Reporter targeted by DOJ...yeah that happened
quote:She is. Watch the video.
Attkisson harassed after unflattering story about admin...that would never happen, she is a lying conspiracy nut..
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:32 am to mmcgrath
quote:
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA.
Did you know, in order to be compliant with Obamacare, my company had to change healthcare plans for all employees. I am not covered for maternity care. I am a 32 year old male.
As a result of paying higher deductibles, I must now pay out of pocket, for short term disability insurance. Something that was previously in my plan, that i now must pay out of pocket.
In summation, Rex, you are an idiot.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:34 am to mmcgrath
quote:
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
You stupid mother fricker
High deductible catastrophic plans make the most sense for someone who can self-insure for the trivial shite.
fricking dipshits don't understand money and they force their stupidity on everyone else
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:47 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Lerner did
And you agree that she was the head of the IRS, appointed by Obama and nothing happened to her as a result of her actions on behalf of the President, correct?
What inferences can we draw then? Either, A. The President directed her actions, or B. The President approves of her actions and would continue to, but for the political fallout from the exposure.
That's awfully flimsy ground on which to be standing on this issue.
quote:
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
Which is fine if the law had been sold that way, honestly. They had to Gruber people to pass the bill. You don't see the inherent problem that people have with that?
quote:
The US govt can't track / prosecute leaks?
And I assume you take that position with regards to Nixon's actions following the Watergate break-in?
Also done by others with the President having plausible deniability... (Colson did it. Liddy did it, etc.)
quote:
I don't think you know what that word means.
We know what it means.
I see the quandry this guy has put y'all in - you seem intellectually honest and engaging at times - but defending the indefensible costs you credibility. You want to say Attkisson is crazy and that may be right. But she was targeted by these people to keep her from investigating them.
Of that I have little doubt. Now, what happens when a crazy person is really being targeted? Their paranoia amps up big time. But it does not make them magically "untargeted", now does it?
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:59 am to mmcgrath
quote:
quote:
Lies about ACA to get it passed...yeah that happened
-----------------------------------------------------
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
Note: this meets the threshold of "explicit approval".
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:18 am to mmcgrath
quote:
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
you idiots are hilarious
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:24 am to mmcgrath
quote:
crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA
What coverages are improved by the ACA specifically?
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:29 am to mmcgrath
quote:
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
Can you link to anything predating passage of Obamacare that mentions crappy plans, or plan requirements? TIA
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:40 am to mmcgrath
quote:Who says my plan is/was crappy? You?
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
Nope! I'll decide for myself thank you very much.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:41 am to mmcgrath
quote:No shite! Thank God I've now got maternity and birth control coverage. As a 46 year old male, I was begging to worry how I was going to afford a pregnancy or my birth control pills.
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)