Started By
Message

re: Bombshell: Email proves Obama/Holder targeted Sharyl Attkisson

Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:28 am to
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35510 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:28 am to
quote:

IRS targeting conservative groups...yeah that happened
Lerner did
quote:

Fast and Furious coverup...yeah that happened
Benghazi coverup...yeah that happened

I don't think you know what that word means.
quote:

Lies about ACA to get it passed...yeah that happened
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
quote:

Fox News Reporter targeted by DOJ...yeah that happened
The US govt can't track / prosecute leaks?
quote:

Attkisson harassed after unflattering story about admin...that would never happen, she is a lying conspiracy nut..
She is. Watch the video.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53109 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:32 am to
quote:

So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA.


Did you know, in order to be compliant with Obamacare, my company had to change healthcare plans for all employees. I am not covered for maternity care. I am a 32 year old male.

As a result of paying higher deductibles, I must now pay out of pocket, for short term disability insurance. Something that was previously in my plan, that i now must pay out of pocket.

In summation, Rex, you are an idiot.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:34 am to
quote:

So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.


You stupid mother fricker

High deductible catastrophic plans make the most sense for someone who can self-insure for the trivial shite.

fricking dipshits don't understand money and they force their stupidity on everyone else
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89803 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Lerner did


And you agree that she was the head of the IRS, appointed by Obama and nothing happened to her as a result of her actions on behalf of the President, correct?

What inferences can we draw then? Either, A. The President directed her actions, or B. The President approves of her actions and would continue to, but for the political fallout from the exposure.

That's awfully flimsy ground on which to be standing on this issue.


quote:

So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.


Which is fine if the law had been sold that way, honestly. They had to Gruber people to pass the bill. You don't see the inherent problem that people have with that?

quote:

The US govt can't track / prosecute leaks?


And I assume you take that position with regards to Nixon's actions following the Watergate break-in?

Also done by others with the President having plausible deniability... (Colson did it. Liddy did it, etc.)

quote:

I don't think you know what that word means.


We know what it means.


I see the quandry this guy has put y'all in - you seem intellectually honest and engaging at times - but defending the indefensible costs you credibility. You want to say Attkisson is crazy and that may be right. But she was targeted by these people to keep her from investigating them.

Of that I have little doubt. Now, what happens when a crazy person is really being targeted? Their paranoia amps up big time. But it does not make them magically "untargeted", now does it?
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:59 am to
quote:

quote:
Lies about ACA to get it passed...yeah that happened
-----------------------------------------------------


So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.


Note: this meets the threshold of "explicit approval".
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.


you idiots are hilarious
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111802 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:24 am to
quote:

crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA


What coverages are improved by the ACA specifically?
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
18177 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:29 am to
quote:

So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.


Can you link to anything predating passage of Obamacare that mentions crappy plans, or plan requirements? TIA
Posted by LSUnKaty
Katy, TX
Member since Dec 2008
4367 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:40 am to
quote:

So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
Who says my plan is/was crappy? You?

Nope! I'll decide for myself thank you very much.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29843 posts
Posted on 11/21/14 at 10:41 am to
quote:

So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
No shite! Thank God I've now got maternity and birth control coverage. As a 46 year old male, I was begging to worry how I was going to afford a pregnancy or my birth control pills.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram